Thiazide Diuretics: Independent Evidence on Safety & Funding

Key takeaways
  • Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics (indapamide, chlortalidone, bendroflumethiazide, hydrochlorothiazide) are among the best-proven blood pressure medicines. In ALLHAT, a US government trial (33,357 people in the chlortalidone, amlodipine and lisinopril comparison; about 42,000 in the whole trial), chlortalidone matched amlodipine and lisinopril for fatal heart disease and heart attack (relative risk 0.98 and 0.99) and did better on heart failure (ALLHAT, JAMA 2002; NHLBI summary).
  • A 2023 Cochrane review of 20 trials and more than 90,000 people found first-line diuretics probably do not change total deaths compared with other classes. They probably cut some events, such as heart failure versus calcium channel blockers (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.82), and fewer people stopped them because of side effects (Reinhart et al., Cochrane 2023).
  • In people aged 80 or over, indapamide-based treatment cut all-cause death by 21% (95% CI 4% to 35%) and heart failure by 64%. The stroke result (30% fewer) just missed statistical significance. This trial, HYVET, was part-funded by the drug's maker, Servier (HYVET, NEJM 2008; funding report).
  • The head-to-head question "chlortalidone or hydrochlorothiazide?" now has a publicly funded answer. In 13,523 older US veterans, switching to chlortalidone did not reduce heart events (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.16) and caused more low potassium (6.0% vs 4.4%) (Diuretic Comparison Project, via ACC).
  • The main harms are blood salt and uric acid problems. Thiazide-induced low sodium typically appears in older women a mean of 19 days after starting (Barber et al. 2015). Diuretics carried a relative risk of 2.36 for new gout in UK primary care data (Choi et al., BMJ 2012).
  • Hydrochlorothiazide alone carries a regulator warning for skin cancer. Danish registry data showed odds of squamous cell carcinoma of 7.38 at the highest cumulative dose, and no similar signal for bendroflumethiazide (MHRA Drug Safety Update, 2018).
  • Money trail: the large trials of the old generic diuretics were mostly publicly funded, because nobody owns them. The exception is indapamide in the very old: Servier, which sells branded indapamide and perindopril, co-funded HYVET. The EU fined Servier €331 million in 2014 over perindopril generics, and a Paris court convicted it in 2021 over a different drug (GaBI; Associated Press).
  • Evidence grade: Strong for lowering blood pressure and preventing events. Insufficient for any outcome advantage of one thiazide over another. Risk for low sodium and potassium, gout, dehydration and (hydrochlorothiazide) skin cancer.

Independent evidence review · Prescription medicine

Thiazide diuretics are cheap, old and well proven. The best publicly funded trials show they prevent strokes, heart failure and heart attacks about as well as newer blood pressure drugs, and in several comparisons slightly better. Whether a "thiazide-like" drug (indapamide, chlortalidone) beats a classic thiazide (hydrochlorothiazide, bendroflumethiazide) on real outcomes is still not settled by a head-to-head trial in the UK, and the one large US trial found no difference between chlortalidone and hydrochlorothiazide. Their harms are mostly blood chemistry: low sodium (especially in older women in the first weeks), low potassium, higher uric acid and gout, and dehydration when someone is ill. Hydrochlorothiazide also carries a skin-cancer warning after long use. We rate confidence as high for the benefit of the class, moderate for the harms, and low for choosing between individual drugs.

Best evidence for lowering blood pressure and preventing stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular events, including in people aged 80 or over
Main risks low sodium and potassium; gout; dehydration and kidney strain when ill; skin cancer with long-term hydrochlorothiazide; dangerous with lithium
Key rule have sodium, potassium and kidney tests as your prescriber advises, protect your skin from the sun, and ask about a sick-day plan
Safety first
Thiazide diuretics are prescription-only medicines. Do not start, stop or change one without the prescriber who manages your blood pressure. Lithium and thiazides should not be combined without specialist monitoring, because lithium can rise to toxic levels (UK indapamide SmPC). When you have vomiting, diarrhoea or a fever with sweats, ask your pharmacist or doctor the same day whether to pause the diuretic. Get urgent help for confusion, severe weakness, fainting, a fast or irregular heartbeat, very little urine, sudden eye pain or blurred vision, or a swollen, blistering or peeling rash. In the UK, call NHS 111 or 999; elsewhere use your local emergency number.

Table of contents

Evidence summary

Claim Evidence Source Funding / conflict Strength
A thiazide-like diuretic prevents heart events as well as newer drugs as first-line treatment 33,357 adults aged 55+ in this comparison (the whole trial enrolled more than 42,000 including a doxazosin arm reported separately), mean follow-up 4.9 years. Six-year fatal CHD or non-fatal heart attack: 11.5% chlortalidone, 11.3% amlodipine (RR 0.98), 11.4% lisinopril (RR 0.99). Heart failure: 10.2% amlodipine vs 7.7% chlortalidone (RR 1.38). ALLHAT, JAMA 2002 Grant N01-HC-35130 from the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Strong
First-line diuretics versus other drug classes 20 trials, over 90,000 people. Total deaths probably no different (for example vs ACE inhibitors RR 1.00, 0.95 to 1.07). Total cardiovascular events vs calcium channel blockers RR 0.93 (0.89 to 0.98). Withdrawals for side effects lower than with beta-blockers (RR 0.78, 0.71 to 0.85). Reinhart et al., Cochrane 2023 University of British Columbia; BC Ministry of Health grant to the Therapeutics Initiative. One author is a Thermo Fisher Scientific employee (since 2020). Strong
Indapamide-based treatment helps people aged 80 and over 3,845 people, mean age 83.6, median follow-up 1.8 years. All-cause death −21% (95% CI −4% to −35%), heart failure −64%, fatal or non-fatal stroke −30% (95% CI −1% to −51%, P=0.06, not significant). Placebo-controlled; perindopril added as needed. HYVET, NEJM 2008 British Heart Foundation and the Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (report). Maker-supported. Moderate
Chlortalidone is better than hydrochlorothiazide on heart outcomes 13,523 older US veterans, median 2.4 years: major cardiovascular events 10.4% vs 10.0%, HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.16). Hypokalaemia 6.0% vs 4.4%. Open-label, 97% men, doses below those in older trials. Diuretic Comparison Project (ACC summary) US Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program No advantage shown
Chlortalidone and hydrochlorothiazide give similar outcomes in routine care 29,873 Ontario adults aged 66+: composite HR 0.93 (0.81 to 1.06). Chlortalidone had more hospital admissions for low potassium (HR 3.06, 2.04 to 4.58) and low sodium (HR 1.68, 1.24 to 2.28). Dhalla et al., Ann Intern Med 2013 Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Observational. Weak
Thiazide-like drugs lower blood pressure more than classic thiazides 12 trials: systolic −5.59 mmHg more (reported 95% CI −5.69 to −5.49, an unusually narrow interval), diastolic −1.98 mmHg. No significant difference in low potassium (OR 1.58, 0.80 to 3.12). Liang et al., J Cell Mol Med 2017 National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81400195, 81500339) Moderate
Thiazides cause low sodium, mostly in older women, early 102 articles. Mean age 75, 79% women, onset a mean 19 days after starting, mean trough sodium 116 mmol/L. Mostly case reports, so incidence cannot be read from it. Barber et al., Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015 Medical Research Council and Academy of Medical Sciences (UK) Risk
Diuretics raise the risk of gout 24,768 gout cases, 50,000 controls (UK primary care). Current diuretic use RR 2.36 (95% CI 2.21 to 2.52); calcium channel blockers 0.87 and losartan 0.81 were lower. Class-level estimate, not thiazide-only. Choi et al., BMJ 2012 US National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grants AR056291, P60AR047785) Risk
Hydrochlorothiazide raises non-melanoma skin cancer risk with long use Danish case-control: squamous cell carcinoma OR 1.75 (ever use), 3.98 (high) and 7.38 (highest cumulative use); basal cell 1.08, 1.29 and 1.54. Meta-analysis: hydrochlorothiazide and non-melanoma skin cancer OR 1.16 (1.08 to 1.24); bendroflumethiazide and indapamide showed no meaningful rise. MHRA 2018; Shao et al., BMC Med 2022 MHRA: UK government. Shao et al.: declared no funding; two of its authors co-wrote one included Danish study. Risk

Independent evidence and credibility scorecard

Independence tiers: 1 = regulator, government body or government-funded trial; 2 = academic or Cochrane team with no declared commercial funding for the work; 3 = independent authors analysing mostly manufacturer trials, or text written by a manufacturer and approved by a regulator; 4 = manufacturer-funded or manufacturer-supported. Credibility runs from A (highest) to D. Most sources come from North America and the UK, so the verdict reflects those health systems.

Source Who funds it Country Independence tier (1–4) Credibility (A–D) Why it would tell the truth / residual bias
ALLHAT (JAMA 2002) US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH) US 1 A A public funder with no drug to sell, and a trial large enough to be checked by others. Residual bias: the trial registry lists the NHLBI as the only sponsor, so we state no company support; a registry entry cannot rule out donated supplies.
Cochrane review, Reinhart 2023 University of British Columbia; BC Ministry of Health (infrastructure grant to the Therapeutics Initiative) Canada 2 A Cochrane's reputation rests on following a published method, and the funder is a provincial health ministry with no drug to sell. Residual bias: the pooled trials are mostly older, and some were industry-run.
HYVET (NEJM 2008) British Heart Foundation and Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier UK / France (trial in Europe, China, Australasia, Tunisia) 4 C Co-funded by the maker of indapamide and perindopril, so treat as a maker-supported result. A placebo-controlled randomised design in a top journal limits spin, and the stroke result was reported as non-significant.
Diuretic Comparison Project (via ACC summary) US Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program US 1 B A government health system asked a question no company would pay for. Residual bias: we read the American College of Cardiology's summary, not the journal paper; open-label design and a 97% male population.
Dhalla et al., Ann Intern Med 2013 Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada 2 B Public payer asking which drug is better value. Residual bias: observational, so unmeasured differences between patients may remain.
Liang et al., J Cell Mol Med 2017 National Natural Science Foundation of China China 2 B Academic meta-analysis with state grant funding. Residual bias: tiny reported confidence interval and an apparent copy of identical glucose and cholesterol figures in the abstract, so we do not lean on it alone.
Barber et al., BJCP 2015 Medical Research Council; Academy of Medical Sciences UK 2 B Academic clinical pharmacologists rewarded for accuracy. Residual bias: mostly case reports, which over-represent severe cases.
Choi et al., BMJ 2012 US National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases US (UK data) 2 B Gout researchers with a public grant. Residual bias: case-control design; diuretics reported as a class, not each drug.
Shao et al., BMC Med 2022 None declared (BMC Medicine funding statement: "None") Taiwan (Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung) 2 B Open-access meta-analysis pre-registered on PROSPERO. Residual bias: pooled observational studies cannot prove cause, and two authors co-wrote one of the included studies.
MHRA Drug Safety Update (14 Nov 2018) UK government (Department of Health and Social Care) UK 1 A A regulator is blamed if it misses a harm, so it errs towards caution. Residual bias: it relies on two Danish studies by the same research group.
US hydrochlorothiazide label (DailyMed) US government publishes it; text is the generic maker's, approved by the FDA US 1 A Warnings and interactions are legally required text. Residual bias: this copy is from a repackager (A-S Medication Solutions); wording differs between makers.
UK indapamide SmPC (Krka) Written by the generic licence holder, Krka (Slovenia), approved by the MHRA UK / Slovenia 3 B A generic maker has no brand to protect and the text must be regulator-approved. Residual bias: written by a company that sells the product.

What thiazide diuretics are

Thiazide diuretics are "water tablets" that make the kidneys pass more salt and water. Two groups are used for blood pressure. Classic thiazides include hydrochlorothiazide and bendroflumethiazide. Thiazide-like drugs have a different chemical structure but the same main action, and include indapamide and chlortalidone (spelt chlorthalidone in the US). In the UK, bendroflumethiazide is the long-standing favourite; in the US, hydrochlorothiazide and chlortalidone dominate.

The drugs are old, off-patent and sold as cheap generics. In the UK, hydrochlorothiazide on its own is not sold for blood pressure. It is only available inside combination tablets, taken by an estimated 28,000 patients when the MHRA reviewed it in 2018 (MHRA). Indapamide is sold in plain and prolonged-release forms; the prolonged-release 1.5 mg tablet is licensed for essential hypertension in adults (UK SmPC).

Which one is preferred depends on where you live. The 2011 NICE hypertension guideline recommended thiazide-like drugs such as indapamide over thiazides such as bendroflumethiazide, yet bendroflumethiazide was still prescribed to 78% of patients taking either drug in a Scottish pilot, and the authors describe the supporting evidence as sparse (Flynn et al., Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022). The current guideline is NICE NG136, which secondary summaries say keeps that preference once a diuretic is needed. We could not open it, so please check it directly.

How they work

Thiazides block a salt-and-chloride transporter in part of the kidney tube, so more sodium and water leave in the urine. Blood volume falls first. Over weeks, blood vessels relax and blood pressure stays lower even after the extra urine settles. That second effect, and why thiazide-like drugs may last longer, is proposed rather than proven in every detail, and we have not cited a source for the mechanism because the sources we opened concentrate on outcomes. What is proven in people is the result: lower blood pressure and fewer events in trials.

The same kidney action explains most side effects. Less sodium and potassium in the blood, more uric acid retained, and more water lost when someone is already dehydrated.

What they are prescribed for

  • High blood pressure. Usually by itself in older people or as part of a combination. The US label lists hypertension "alone or to enhance other antihypertensives" (US label).
  • Fluid build-up (oedema) from heart failure, liver cirrhosis, kidney disease, or from corticosteroid or oestrogen treatment (US label). The NHS lists bendroflumethiazide for high blood pressure and oedema (NHS).

Indapamide's UK licence is for essential hypertension only (UK SmPC).

What works and what does not

UseVerdictWhy
Preventing events in high blood pressureWorksALLHAT, HYVET and the Cochrane review all support benefit (Cochrane 2023).
Adults aged 80 or overWorksIndapamide-based regimen cut death and heart failure in HYVET (maker-supported).
Choosing chlortalidone over hydrochlorothiazide to improve outcomesNot shownNo outcome difference in the VA trial; more low potassium (ACC).
Choosing indapamide over bendroflumethiazide on hard outcomesInsufficientGuideline preference rests on sparse outcome data; a Scottish trial is still being built (EVIDENCE).
Avoiding diabetesMixedA network meta-analysis found diuretics did not protect against new-onset diabetes, and labels warn that thiazides can unmask diabetes.
Standalone "detox" or weight lossNo evidenceNot a licensed use in any source we opened.

Benefits by claim

Do thiazides prevent heart attacks and strokes?

Yes, and ALLHAT is the key independent test. The whole trial enrolled more than 42,000 people aged 55 or over with high blood pressure and another risk factor; the JAMA 2002 paper compares chlortalidone with amlodipine or lisinopril in 33,357 of them (doxazosin was a separate arm). For the main outcome (fatal heart disease or non-fatal heart attack) neither amlodipine nor lisinopril beat chlortalidone. Amlodipine caused more heart failure (10.2% vs 7.7%), and lisinopril was linked to more combined cardiovascular disease (33.3% vs 30.9%), stroke (6.3% vs 5.6%) and heart failure (8.7% vs 7.7%) (ALLHAT). The doxazosin arm was stopped a year early because of more heart failure (NHLBI). In plain terms, no newer drug did better, and the old diuretic did slightly better on heart failure.

The 2023 Cochrane review, covering 20 active-comparator trials, reached a similar view. Against ACE inhibitors, total cardiovascular events were similar (RR 0.97, 0.92 to 1.02) and stroke was slightly lower with diuretics (RR 0.89, 0.80 to 0.99). Against calcium channel blockers, heart failure was lower (RR 0.74, 0.66 to 0.82). Against alpha-blockers, total events were much lower (RR 0.74, 0.69 to 0.80). The authors found no other class with a clinically important advantage (Cochrane).

Heart failure: first-line diuretic vs comparator (risk ratio; lower than 1.00 favours the diuretic)
vs alpha-blockers (0.51)
vs beta-blockers (0.69)
vs calcium channel blockers (0.74)
vs ACE inhibitors (0.94)
Risk ratios for heart failure from the 2023 Cochrane review (Reinhart et al.). Bar length equals the risk ratio. The beta-blocker (0.69, 0.40 to 1.19) and ACE inhibitor (0.94, 0.84 to 1.04) intervals include 1.00, so only the calcium channel blocker and alpha-blocker results are clearly different.

Does it work in people aged 80 and over?

HYVET randomised 3,845 people aged 80 or older with systolic pressure of 160 mmHg or more to sustained-release indapamide 1.5 mg or placebo, with perindopril added if needed. After a median 1.8 years, blood pressure was 15.0/6.1 mmHg lower. All-cause death fell 21% (95% CI 4% to 35%), heart failure fell 64%, and serious adverse events were fewer (358 vs 448). The headline stroke reduction of 30% had a confidence interval that crossed zero (−1% to 51%) (HYVET). This was co-funded by the maker of both drugs (report), and the result is for indapamide specifically.

Is chlortalidone better than hydrochlorothiazide?

The case for chlortalidone came from lower blood pressure in some trials and its role in ALLHAT. The Diuretic Comparison Project tested it directly. Veterans already on hydrochlorothiazide were randomised to switch to chlortalidone or carry on. Major cardiovascular events were 10.4% vs 10.0% (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.16), and hypokalaemia was more common with chlortalidone (6.0% vs 4.4%). In people with a prior heart attack or stroke the HR was 0.73 (0.57 to 0.94), which the authors called hypothesis-generating (ACC). A 2024 systematic review of six observational studies (368,066 patients) found no significant difference in heart events and about double the odds of low potassium with chlortalidone (OR 2.10, 1.15 to 3.84) (Song et al. 2024).

Do thiazide-like drugs lower blood pressure more?

A 2017 meta-analysis of 12 trials found a further 5.6 mmHg systolic reduction with indapamide or chlortalidone than with hydrochlorothiazide, and no clear difference in low potassium or sodium (Liang et al.). Lower pressure does not guarantee fewer events, which is why the outcome trials above matter more. A UK trial comparing indapamide with bendroflumethiazide in routine care is under way (EVIDENCE).

Risks and all side effects

Serious risks
Low sodium (hyponatraemia). The UK SmPC says sodium should be measured before starting and then regularly, more often in older people (SmPC). In a review of published cases, patients were on average 75, 79% were women, and symptoms arose a mean 19 days after starting. The authors suggest one blood test at 7 to 14 days may miss cases (Barber et al.).
Low potassium (hypokalaemia). The main risk with indapamide. In the SmPC trial data, potassium fell below 3.4 mmol/l in 10% on 1.5 mg and 25% on 2.5 mg. It can cause dangerous heart rhythms, especially with digoxin or QT-prolonging drugs (SmPC).
Sudden eye pain or blurred vision. Sulfonamide-type drugs can rarely cause acute myopia and angle-closure glaucoma, within hours to weeks of starting; the main treatment is to stop the drug (US label).
Severe skin and blood reactions. Very rarely: agranulocytosis, pancreatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SmPC).

Gout

Thiazides reduce the kidney's removal of uric acid. In UK primary care data, current diuretic use carried a relative risk of 2.36 (95% CI 2.21 to 2.52) for new gout, the highest of the classes studied, while calcium channel blockers (0.87) and losartan (0.81) were lower. That is a class-wide figure, and the design cannot prove cause (Choi et al.). The NHS asks people with gout to tell their doctor before starting bendroflumethiazide (NHS).

Diabetes and blood sugar

US labels say hyperglycaemia may unmask latent diabetes and antidiabetic doses may need adjusting (US label). A 2017 network meta-analysis of 23 trials (224,832 patients) found diuretics did not help prevent new-onset diabetes. We could not retrieve its numerical estimates, so we do not quote them (Yang and Xu). The UK SmPC advises blood glucose monitoring, especially with low potassium (SmPC).

Skin cancer and sun sensitivity

This applies mainly to hydrochlorothiazide. In 2018 the EU safety committee (PRAC) recommended updating product information for all hydrochlorothiazide medicines after Danish studies. For 50,000 mg or more cumulative use, basal cell carcinoma risk may be about 1.3 times higher and squamous cell carcinoma about 4 times higher; 50,000 mg is roughly 12.5 mg daily for 11 years (AEMPS, Spain). The MHRA reported that the Danish studies found no similar association with bendroflumethiazide, furosemide, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, and gave a squamous cell odds ratio of 7.38 at the highest cumulative use (MHRA; Pedersen et al., JAAD 2018). The FDA added non-melanoma skin cancer to hydrochlorothiazide labels on 20 August 2020 after a Sentinel comparison with ACE inhibitors, with the excess mainly squamous cell cancer in White patients taking large cumulative doses (FDA via Sentinel).

A 2024 meta-analysis of 42 articles found thiazides linked to squamous cell carcinoma (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.61) but rated the evidence low or very low quality (Cohen et al., JID Innov 2024). A 2022 meta-analysis found hydrochlorothiazide with OR 1.16 (1.08 to 1.24) for non-melanoma skin cancer and no meaningful increase for bendroflumethiazide or indapamide (Shao et al.). After the warning, Danish hydrochlorothiazide use fell by 44% with no sign of increased harm (Pottégard et al. 2021).

Photosensitivity is a separate, rarer reaction. The indapamide SmPC lists it as "not known" frequency and says to stop treatment if it happens and protect exposed skin if the drug is restarted (SmPC). Our skin-cancer pages cover sunscreen and squamous cell carcinoma.

Other side effects

  • Common (NHS, bendroflumethiazide): passing urine more often, thirst and dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, loss of appetite, constipation, and dizziness from low blood pressure (NHS).
  • Indapamide (SmPC): common low potassium and rash; uncommon low sodium, vomiting, purpura and erectile dysfunction; "not known" torsade de pointes, QT prolongation, hepatitis and hepatic encephalopathy (SmPC).
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (US label): orthostatic hypotension, pancreatitis, jaundice, aplastic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, interstitial nephritis, hair loss, tingling and vertigo (US label).
  • Doping: indapamide can give a positive doping test (SmPC).

Sick-day rules

Diuretics can cause or worsen dehydration in an unwell patient, and NHS Scotland's sick-day guidance names diuretics, including furosemide and bendroflumethiazide, as medicines that can cause or worsen dehydration in an ill patient (NHS Scotland). Typical triggers are vomiting, diarrhoea, fever or sweats. The ones to check with a pharmacist or doctor are diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, NSAIDs and metformin. We have not found an authoritative page we could open that gives a single national restart rule, so ask your own prescriber.

All interactions

  • Lithium: "not recommended" with indapamide, and generally to be avoided with hydrochlorothiazide, because lithium can reach toxic levels (SmPC; US label). See our lithium page.
  • NSAIDs and high-dose salicylates: can blunt the blood pressure effect and raise the risk of acute kidney injury in dehydrated people (SmPC).
  • QT-prolonging drugs (some antiarrhythmics, some antipsychotics) and digitalis medicines: low potassium raises the risk of dangerous rhythms (SmPC).
  • ACE inhibitors: sudden low blood pressure or kidney failure can occur if sodium is depleted (SmPC). See ramipril and losartan.
  • Metformin: lactic acidosis risk rises if the diuretic impairs the kidneys (SmPC).
  • Other listed: potassium-sparing diuretics, allopurinol, iodinated contrast media, ciclosporin or tacrolimus, corticosteroids and calcium salts (SmPC).
  • US label also lists: antidiabetic medicines (dose changes may be needed), alcohol, barbiturates and narcotics (worse standing-up dizziness), cholestyramine and colestipol (less absorption), and corticosteroids (more potassium loss) (US label).

Supplement and herbal interactions were not covered in the sources we could open; see our page on supplements and heart-medicine interactions.

Who should avoid thiazide diuretics

  • Anuria or allergy to sulfonamide-derived drugs (hydrochlorothiazide) (US label).
  • Indapamide: contraindicated with severe kidney failure (creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min), hepatic encephalopathy or severe liver impairment, existing low potassium, or sulfonamide hypersensitivity (SmPC).
  • Take care and tell your doctor first if you have Addison's disease, kidney or liver problems, diabetes, gout, lupus, abnormal sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium or uric acid levels, or are being sick or have diarrhoea (NHS). The US label also warns of possible activation of systemic lupus.
  • Pregnancy: the US label says routine diuretic use in a normal pregnancy is inappropriate and use should be only if clearly needed; thiazides cross the placenta, with risks including newborn jaundice and low platelets (US label). The UK indapamide SmPC advises avoiding it in pregnancy as a precaution (SmPC).
  • Breastfeeding: indapamide should not be used (SmPC); hydrochlorothiazide passes into milk (US label).
  • Older adults, women of low weight, people on several drugs: higher risk of low sodium and potassium; the SmPC asks for closer monitoring (SmPC).
  • Prior skin cancer: regulators advise reconsidering hydrochlorothiazide (MHRA). That is a decision for the prescriber.

Dosage and how to take them

The figures below are label or trial doses, not personal advice.

  • Indapamide prolonged-release (UK SmPC): one 1.5 mg tablet every 24 hours, preferably in the morning, swallowed whole. Electrolyte changes become more marked above that dose (SmPC). HYVET used the same 1.5 mg sustained-release form.
  • Bendroflumethiazide (NHS): 2.5 mg once a day for blood pressure; 5 mg to 10 mg a day for oedema; lower doses may apply over 65 or with kidney problems; usually in the morning (NHS).
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (US label): hypertension, 25 mg once daily, which may go up to 50 mg; the label says doses above 50 mg are often linked to marked drops in potassium. Oedema, 25 to 100 mg daily (US label). In the UK the MHRA said 25 mg products should be used for hypertension only if lower-dose products do not control pressure (MHRA).
  • Chlortalidone (trial conversion): in the Diuretic Comparison Project, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg was switched to chlortalidone 12.5 mg, and 50 mg to 25 mg (ACC). We did not open a chlortalidone label, so we give no label dose.

Missed dose (NHS): take it when you remember, unless it is late afternoon and you normally take it in the morning, and never double up (NHS). Product quality issues were not identified in the sources we opened.

Follow the money: who makes them and who funded the evidence

Who makes and sells them

Almost everything in this class is a generic. Hydrochlorothiazide, bendroflumethiazide and chlortalidone are old compounds sold by many makers. The indapamide label we opened belongs to Krka, a Slovenian generic company (UK SmPC). Natrilix SR (branded indapamide) and perindopril (Coversyl) are Servier products, as listed in search results from Irish and UK medicine databases and in Servier's portfolio on Wikipedia; we did not open those listings. Servier is a French company described as governed by a non-profit foundation and headquartered in Suresnes (Wikipedia, low-reliability source; we could not open Servier's own site to confirm).

Price shapes behaviour. A UK trial protocol excluded chlortalidone from its design because it cost about £88 a month and was rarely used in the UK (EVIDENCE protocol).

Who funded the trials

The most useful studies had no commercial sponsor: ALLHAT (NHLBI), the Diuretic Comparison Project (US Veterans Affairs), the Cochrane review (University of British Columbia and the BC Ministry of Health), Ontario's Dhalla study (provincial health ministry and CIHR), and the Scottish pilot (Chief Scientist Office, Scotland) (Flynn et al.). The exception is HYVET, co-funded by the British Heart Foundation and Servier's research institute (report). Because HYVET is the only large placebo-controlled trial of treating the very old with a diuretic-based regimen, its maker support cannot be avoided, only labelled.

Follow the money

Research funding at a glance

Funding & backersSource & studyClaim & limits

12 sources graded. The counts below are the independence tiers assigned in the scorecard above. They count sources, not funding amounts or evidence quality.

Tier 14Independent
Tier 26Indirect ties
Tier 31Interested party
Tier 41Self-interested

Public funding alone does not prove independence, and commercial funding alone does not prove a claim false. Named funders, countries and relationships are in the scorecard and source notes.

Documented integrity events

  • Perindopril generics (2014). The European Commission fined Servier €331 million, and five generic makers €96.7 million in total, for patent settlements and a technology purchase that delayed generic perindopril entry by about four more years (GaBI). This concerns a different drug from the diuretics here, and we did not check the appeal outcome.
  • Mediator (benfluorex) (2021). A Paris court found Servier guilty of manslaughter, involuntary wounding and aggravated deception, acquitted it of fraud, and fined it €2.7 million, with damages to more than 6,500 plaintiffs. The French medicines agency was also convicted (Associated Press). Mediator is not a diuretic, and we did not verify any appeal (Wikipedia summary; we have not verified the appeal outcome).
  • Regulator action on hydrochlorothiazide (2018 to 2020). Not an integrity event for the makers, but a safety finding by the PRAC, MHRA, AEMPS and FDA that led to label changes (MHRA).

Whether any individual in these trials holds personal ties to makers was not something we could check from the abstracts we opened, so we state none.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a thiazide and a thiazide-like diuretic?

They have different chemical structures but act in the same part of the kidney. Hydrochlorothiazide and bendroflumethiazide are classic thiazides; indapamide and chlortalidone are thiazide-like. A 2017 meta-analysis found thiazide-like drugs lowered systolic pressure by a further 5.6 mmHg (Liang et al.), but the big US trial of chlortalidone against hydrochlorothiazide found no difference in heart events (ACC).

Why does the UK prefer indapamide?

The 2011 NICE guideline recommended thiazide-like drugs such as indapamide over bendroflumethiazide. A Scottish team notes the supporting evidence is sparse and that bendroflumethiazide stayed widely used (Flynn et al.). We could not open the current NICE page (NG136), so please read it directly.

Can thiazides cause low sodium?

Yes. In published cases the typical patient was a 75-year-old woman, and onset was a mean 19 days after starting (Barber et al.). Report new confusion, nausea, severe tiredness or unsteadiness promptly.

Do thiazides cause gout?

They are linked to a higher risk. Diuretics had a relative risk of 2.36 for new gout in UK data (Choi et al.). A prescriber may weigh this if you already have gout.

Do thiazides cause skin cancer?

The warning is strongest for hydrochlorothiazide after long, high cumulative use. The MHRA reported no similar association for bendroflumethiazide in Danish studies (MHRA), and a 2022 meta-analysis found no meaningful rise for indapamide (Shao et al.). Check your skin and limit sun exposure; regulators did not tell patients to stop treatment on their own (AEMPS).

Do thiazides cause diabetes?

US labels warn that hyperglycaemia may unmask latent diabetes (US label). A network meta-analysis found diuretics did not help prevent new-onset diabetes (Yang and Xu). Blood sugar checks are advised.

Should a diuretic be paused during illness?

Sick-day guidance in Scotland names diuretics as medicines that can make dehydration more likely in an ill patient (NHS Scotland). Do not decide alone; ask your pharmacist or doctor, and get urgent help if you cannot keep fluids down.

Is the Servier-funded HYVET trial trustworthy?

It was a randomised, placebo-controlled trial published in a leading journal, with a stroke result reported as not significant (HYVET). But the maker of indapamide co-funded it (report), so we label it as maker-supported and rely on the independent Cochrane and ALLHAT evidence for the class.

Sources and funding notes

What we could not verify. NICE NG136 would not open for our research tools, so the current wording of its diuretic recommendation is unchecked. We read the Diuretic Comparison Project through the American College of Cardiology's summary, not the NEJM paper. Secondary reports say drug companies supplied study medication in ALLHAT, but the NHLBI page does not mention it and we did not open the JAMA acknowledgements. We could not retrieve numerical diabetes estimates, a funding statement for Pedersen et al. 2018 or Shao et al. 2022, the FDA's own excess-risk figures, an authoritative restart rule for sick-day guidance, a chlortalidone label, or Servier's own ownership statement. Prescribing volumes for England were not retrieved. The Servier appeals were not checked. We could not open the full Cochrane review, so its funding statement (University of British Columbia, BC Ministry of Health, and one Thermo Fisher employee author) is reported from our research notes and not independently confirmed here. Most pages are abstracts and summaries, not full papers.

  1. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators, JAMA 2002 (PMID 12479763) — primary trial; US NHLBI grant N01-HC-35130.
  2. NHLBI ALLHAT summary — US government institute; funder of the trial.
  3. Reinhart et al., Cochrane 2023 (PMID 37439548) — systematic review; University of British Columbia, BC Ministry of Health; one author employed by Thermo Fisher Scientific.
  4. Beckett et al., HYVET, NEJM 2008 (PMID 18378519) — trial; British Heart Foundation and Servier institute.
  5. Healthcare in Europe news report, 31 Aug 2007 — source for the HYVET funding statement; trade news site.
  6. American College of Cardiology, Diuretic Comparison Project — summary of Ishani et al., NEJM 2022; trial sponsor VA Cooperative Studies Program; the ACC is a US professional society.
  7. Dhalla et al., Ann Intern Med 2013 (PMID 23552325); Song et al. 2024 (PMID 39484134) — observational cohort and systematic review; Ontario ministry/CIHR; Song et al. funding not in record.
  8. Liang et al., J Cell Mol Med 2017 (PMID 28631393) — meta-analysis; National Natural Science Foundation of China.
  9. Barber et al., Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015 (PMID 25139696) — systematic review; Medical Research Council, Academy of Medical Sciences.
  10. Choi et al., BMJ 2012 (PMID 22240117) — case-control; NIAMS (US).
  11. Yang and Xu, J Cell Mol Med 2017 (PMID 28230330) — network meta-analysis; funding not in record.
  12. Shao et al., BMC Med 2022 (PMID 35794547); Cohen et al., JID Innov 2024 (PMID 38736521); Pottégard et al. 2021 (PMID 34435407) — skin-cancer meta-analyses and use study; Cohen et al.: NIH, NCI, Wellcome Trust and others; Shao and Pottégard: no funding in record.
  13. Pedersen et al., J Am Acad Dermatol 2018 (PMID 29217346) — Danish case-control; funding not retrieved.
  14. MHRA Drug Safety Update, 14 November 2018 — UK regulator; government funded.
  15. AEMPS (Spain) safety note 13/2018 — national regulator summarising the EU PRAC review; government funded.
  16. FDA Sentinel labelling-change record, 20 August 2020 — US regulator; government funded with user fees for drug review.
  17. Hydrochlorothiazide tablet label (A-S Medication Solutions repackage, DailyMed) — regulator-approved label; generic maker text.
  18. Indapamide Krka 1.5 mg prolonged-release tablets SmPC (updated 31 January 2023) — regulator-approved; written by the generic licence holder Krka (Slovenia).
  19. NHS: bendroflumethiazide (with side effects, who can take it and how to take it) — patient information; funded by UK government via NHS England.
  20. NHS Scotland, Sick Day Rules — Effective Prescribing and Therapeutics; NHS Scotland, government funded.
  21. Flynn et al., Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022 (EVIDENCE feasibility) — Catalyst Grant from the Chief Scientist Office, Scotland; and HRA summary of EVIDENCE, sponsored by the University of Dundee; funder not named.
  22. NICE NG136 — UK guideline body; government funded; page could not be opened by our tools.
  23. GaBI Online, EC perindopril decision — trade publication summarising the European Commission decision of 9 July 2014; publisher is a generics-industry news site.
  24. Associated Press via News4Jax, 29 March 2021 — newswire report of the Mediator verdict.
  25. Wikipedia: Servier — crowd-edited; used only for ownership, headquarters and appeal context; low reliability.

Educational research reviewed 6 October 2026. This article is not medical advice; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist before starting, stopping or combining treatments.

Have a question — or want us to cover something?

Ask about anything on this page, or request the next deep dive: an ingredient, a supplement, or a health concern. We use published research, evidence syntheses, and regulatory guidance, with clear source links.

We store your topic, message, optional email, and this page so we can manage and reply to the request. Do not include diagnoses, medications, or other sensitive medical information. See our Privacy Policy.