- Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a lifelong condition in which the immune system attacks the brain and spinal cord. It cannot be cured, but treatment can slow it and ease symptoms (NHS). An estimated 2.9 million people live with MS worldwide (MS International Federation, Atlas of MS).
- Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) work best against relapses, not against slow progression. A Cochrane network meta-analysis of 50 trials (36,541 people) found that over 2 years natalizumab, cladribine and alemtuzumab cut relapses most (risk ratios 0.53 to 0.57 versus placebo, high certainty), while interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate cut them less (RR 0.84). It also found evidence beyond 2 years was insufficient (Gonzalez-Lorenzo et al., Cochrane 2024).
- The best-known DMT trials were paid for by the makers. Ocrelizumab (OPERA and ORATORIO) was funded by Roche, and ofatumumab (ASCLEPIOS) by Novartis (OPERA; ORATORIO; ASCLEPIOS). The Cochrane team rated sponsor influence on reporting or analysis as high risk in 68% of the trials it pooled.
- Publicly funded head-to-head trials are starting to report. In a Norwegian-Swedish trial, the cheap, older antibody rituximab was non-inferior to ocrelizumab on new MRI lesions in newly diagnosed relapsing MS (OVERLORD-MS, Bergen). In a Swedish trial of 200 people, relapses occurred in 3% on rituximab and 16% on dimethyl fumarate (RIFUND-MS, Lancet Neurol 2022).
- Vitamin D is unproven as a treatment. A Cochrane review of 12 trials (933 people) found no clear effect on relapses, disability or MRI lesions, with very low quality evidence (Jagannath et al. 2018). The newest trial, publicly funded in France, found less disease activity after a first attack with 100,000 IU every 2 weeks (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.87) (D-Lay MS, JAMA 2025), but an Australian-New Zealand trial found no benefit at 1,000 to 10,000 IU a day (PrevANZ, Brain 2024).
- No diet has been shown to change the course of MS. The Cochrane dietary review pooled 30 trials, all at unknown or high risk of bias, and concluded the evidence is uncertain (Parks et al., Cochrane 2020).
- Money trail: MS drugs are among the dearest medicines sold. In the US, first-generation DMTs launched at roughly $8,000 to $11,000 a year and reached about $60,000 (Hartung et al., Neurology 2015). Biogen paid about $900 million to settle allegations of improper payments to doctors involving three MS drugs (US Department of Justice, 2022), and Teva was reported to agree to pay about $425 million over Copaxone copay assistance (Fierce Pharma, 2024). Neither company admitted liability in the coverage we saw.
- Evidence grade: Strong for DMTs reducing relapses over 2 years. Moderate for oral steroids in relapse and for anti-CD20 drugs in relapsing MS. Weak for slowing progression. Insufficient for vitamin D and diets. Risk of serious infection and rare brain infection with some DMTs.
Independent evidence review · Condition
Multiple sclerosis is treatable but not curable. Medicines that suppress the immune system clearly reduce relapses over the first two years, and the strongest ones (natalizumab, cladribine, alemtuzumab, the anti-CD20 antibodies) do so most. Their effect on long-term disability is much less certain, and most of the pivotal trials were paid for and run by the manufacturers. Vitamin D and special diets are not proven to change the disease. Our confidence is high that DMTs cut relapses, moderate that anti-CD20 drugs are among the most effective, and low for any claim about long-term disability, vitamin D or diet.
New weakness or numbness in one arm, sudden loss or blurring of vision, or balance problems can be a stroke, not an MS relapse. The NHS advises calling 999 or going to A&E and not driving yourself (NHS). Anyone on a DMT who develops new neurological symptoms, fever or signs of infection should contact their MS team promptly, because some of these medicines raise the risk of serious infection (EMA). Low mood is common in long-term illness. If you are having thoughts of suicide or self-harm, get help now: call your local emergency services; in the US call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline; in the UK call Samaritans on 116 123; or your local emergency number.
Table of contents
- Evidence summary
- What multiple sclerosis is
- Symptoms and red flags
- Causes and risk factors
- Diagnosis: the McDonald criteria
- Treatments: what works and what does not
- Medicines in detail
- Supplements, diet and lifestyle claims
- Risks and side effects
- Who to see
- Follow the money: who makes the drugs and who funded the evidence
- Related research
- Frequently asked questions
- Sources and funding notes
Evidence summary
| Claim | Evidence | Source | Funding / conflict | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMTs reduce relapses in relapsing-remitting MS | 50 trials, 36,541 people. Relapses over 24 months versus placebo: cladribine RR 0.53 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.64), natalizumab 0.56 (0.48 to 0.65), alemtuzumab 0.57 (0.47 to 0.68) (high certainty); dimethyl fumarate 0.62, fingolimod 0.54; glatiramer 0.84 (0.76 to 0.93) and interferon beta-1a 0.84 (0.78 to 0.91) (moderate certainty). Evidence beyond 2 years insufficient. | Cochrane 2024 | No funding text in the record we could read. Over half of the pooled trials were pharmaceutical-sponsored; sponsor influence rated high risk in 68%. | Strong (relapses, 2 years) |
| DMTs slow long-term disability | Only natalizumab showed a probable effect on 2-year disability worsening (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.75, moderate certainty). No placebo-controlled data at 3 years. | Cochrane 2024 | As above. | Weak |
| Ocrelizumab beats interferon beta-1a in relapsing MS | Two trials, 821 and 835 people. Annualised relapse rate 0.16 versus 0.29. Disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks 9.1% versus 13.6% (HR 0.60). Serious infection 1.3% versus 2.9%; infusion reactions 34.3% on ocrelizumab. | OPERA I and II, NEJM 2017 | Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche (the drug's maker). | Moderate (maker-funded) |
| Ocrelizumab slows primary progressive MS | 732 people. Disability progression at 12 weeks 32.9% versus 39.3% on placebo (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98). Neoplasms 2.3% versus 0.8%. | ORATORIO, NEJM 2017 | Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. | Weak (modest effect) |
| Ofatumumab beats teriflunomide in relapsing MS | 946 versus 936 people. Annualised relapse rate 0.11 versus 0.22 and 0.10 versus 0.25 in the two trials. Confirmed disability worsening at 3 months 10.9% versus 15.0%. Injection reactions 20.2% versus 15.0%. | ASCLEPIOS I and II, NEJM 2020 | Funded by Novartis (the drug's maker). Comparator was a modest-potency pill, so no inference about other drugs. | Moderate (maker-funded) |
| Rituximab is as good as ocrelizumab at suppressing MRI activity | Randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial in newly diagnosed relapsing MS (Norway and Sweden), 30 months. Rituximab was non-inferior for new T2 lesions between months 6 and 24; the group describes it as designed to test equivalence, not superiority. | OVERLORD-MS (NEJM 2026), Bergen release | Publicly funded (KLINBEFORSK). We saw only the investigators' release and a news summary, not the full paper. | Moderate (one trial) |
| Rituximab beats dimethyl fumarate | 200 people. Relapse in 3% versus 16% (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.62). | RIFUND-MS, Lancet Neurol 2022 | Swedish Research Council. | Moderate (one trial) |
| Oral steroids work as well as intravenous for relapses | 199 people, 1000 mg methylprednisolone daily for 3 days. Improvement by day 28 in 81% oral versus 80% intravenous (difference 0.5%, 90% CI −9.5 to 10.4). Insomnia 77% versus 64%. Cochrane (5 trials, 215 people) found no difference. | COPOUSEP, Lancet 2015; Cochrane 2012 | COPOUSEP: French Health Ministry, Ligue Française contre la SEP and Teva. Cochrane: no funding found in the record. | Moderate |
| Vitamin D supplements change the course of MS | Cochrane: 12 trials, 933 people, no effect on relapses, disability or MRI lesions (very low quality). SOLAR: no difference in no evidence of disease activity (36.3% versus 35.3%). PrevANZ: no benefit at up to 10,000 IU a day. D-Lay MS: disease activity 60.3% versus 74.1% (HR 0.66). | Cochrane 2018; SOLAR; PrevANZ; D-Lay MS | SOLAR: Merck KGaA (maker of MS drugs). PrevANZ: MS Australia. D-Lay MS: French Ministry of Health. | Insufficient (mixed) |
| A special diet slows or reverses MS | 30 trials. Polyunsaturated fats versus monounsaturated: relapses RR 1.02 (0.88 to 1.20). Antioxidants versus placebo: relapses RR 0.98 (0.59 to 1.64). All trials at unknown or high risk of bias. | Cochrane 2020 | No grants listed in the record. | Insufficient |
| Epstein-Barr virus infection raises MS risk | More than 10 million young adults on active US military duty, 955 of whom developed MS. Risk rose 32-fold after Epstein-Barr infection, with no similar rise after other viruses. | Bjornevik et al., Science 2022 | US National Institutes of Health (NINDS) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute. | Strong (association) |
| Natalizumab and alemtuzumab carry serious, specific risks | Natalizumab: rare brain infection (PML) in higher-risk patients, with regular MRI and JC virus testing advised. Alemtuzumab: use restricted in the EU after reports of serious heart, stroke and immune events, including deaths. | EMA, Tysabri 2016; EMA, Lemtrada 2019 | EU regulator. | Risk |
| Stem cell transplant beats the best drugs | Three randomised trials (RAM-MS, STAR-MS, BEAT-MS) have not reported primary results in the sources we found. | RAM-MS registry entry | RAM-MS is hospital-led in Norway; BEAT-MS is sponsored by a US government institute (NIAID). | Insufficient (pending) |
Independent evidence and credibility scorecard
Independence tiers: 1 = regulator or government body; 2 = academic, charity or Cochrane team with no declared commercial funding for the work; 3 = independent authors analysing mostly manufacturer-run trials, or minor declared industry ties; 4 = manufacturer-funded or manufacturer-authored. Credibility runs from A (highest) to D. Our sources cluster in Europe and the US. Most DMT evidence comes from trials sponsored by a handful of Swiss, German, US and Israeli companies, so the pivotal evidence reflects industry priorities more than patient priorities such as long-term disability.
| Source | Who funds it | Country | Independence tier (1–4) | Credibility (A–D) | Why it would tell the truth / residual bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICE guideline NG220 and technology appraisals | UK public body (funding source not checked by us) | UK | 1 | A | Legally accountable and weighs cost against benefit. Appraisals rest on company submissions, and the real NHS prices are confidential, so the public cannot check the value claims. |
| European Medicines Agency safety reviews | EU institutions; the agency also receives fees from companies (not checked here) | EU (multinational) | 1 | A | Legal duty to act on safety signals, and it restricted Lemtrada after reports of deaths. Slower than patients would like and dependent on company-reported data. |
| NHS multiple sclerosis page | UK National Health Service | UK | 1 | A | Public service with clinical review (last reviewed 16 August 2024). Brief and not an evidence review. |
| Cochrane network meta-analysis of DMTs (2024) | Funding not stated in the records we could read | International; authors named in the record (Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Filippini, Tramacere, Nonino and others) | 3 | B | Transparent methods and GRADE ratings, and it flags sponsor bias itself. It can only pool what the sponsors ran, so it inherits their choice of comparators and follow-up. |
| Cochrane review of vitamin D (Jagannath 2018) | No funding found in the record | International | 2 | B | Reputation depends on honest null results. Search ended in 2017, so it predates D-Lay MS and PrevANZ. |
| D-Lay MS (JAMA 2025) | French Ministry of Health grant; funder had no role in design or analysis | France | 2 | B | Public money, placebo-controlled, pre-registered. The authors list limits including infrequent MRI timing and exploratory secondary outcomes. |
| PrevANZ vitamin D trial (Brain 2024) | MS Australia (charity), per its own announcement; the record lists the funder as PREVANZ | Australia and New Zealand | 2 | B | A charity paid for a trial that industry would not, and reported a null result. A disease charity could prefer a positive finding. |
| SOLAR vitamin D add-on trial (Neurology 2019) | Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, which also funded the analyses; some authors are Merck employees or former employees | Germany (sponsor); 11 European countries (sites) | 4 | D | The sponsor sells MS medicines, so it has a stake in what add-on therapies look like. The primary result was negative and was reported as such. |
| OVERLORD-MS and RIFUND-MS (rituximab trials) | Public funders: KLINBEFORSK (Norway); Swedish Research Council and regional bodies (Sweden) | Norway and Sweden | 2 | B | No company sells rituximab for MS, so no one profits from the trial result. Hospitals save money if the cheap drug wins, which is a mild institutional incentive. |
| COPOUSEP steroid trial (Lancet 2015) | French Health Ministry, Ligue Française contre la SEP, and Teva | France | 3 | B | Double-blind and publicly led. Teva sells another MS drug (Copaxone) but not the steroid tested. |
| Maker-funded pivotal trials: OPERA, ORATORIO (Roche) and ASCLEPIOS (Novartis) | F. Hoffmann-La Roche; Novartis | Switzerland (both companies) | 4 | D | Needed for regulatory approval, so careful design pays. But the company chooses comparators, endpoints and what to publish, and both sell the drug tested. |
| Cochrane dietary review (Parks 2020) | No grants listed in the record | Canada and international (authors) | 2 | B | No product to sell, and a null verdict harms no one financially. It rests on small, poor-quality trials. |
| Epstein-Barr cohort study (Science 2022) | US National Institutes of Health (NINDS) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute | US | 2 | B | Large military cohort with stored blood samples, and a top journal that rewards replicable work. An association, not proof of cause. |
| Hartung et al., MS drug prices (Neurology 2015) | No targeted funding; fee paid by a university department | US | 2 | B | Price history is checkable fact. One author has consulted for Teva and Biogen and received public and charity grants, as the paper declares. |
| 2024 McDonald criteria (Lancet Neurology 2025) | National Multiple Sclerosis Society and ECTRIMS | US and Europe | 3 | B | Expert consensus from the field's own bodies. Earlier diagnosis means more people eligible for treatment, a benefit to the drug market that we cannot rule out as a pull. |
What multiple sclerosis is
MS affects the brain and spinal cord. The immune system attacks nerve tissue, symptoms come and go as relapses or worsen steadily, and there is no cure (NHS). An estimated 2.9 million people live with MS worldwide (Atlas of MS), and the MS Society reports more than 150,000 in the UK (MS Society). The NHS describes three main courses:
- Relapsing-remitting MS: flare-ups (relapses) followed by recovery. It often becomes secondary progressive over time.
- Secondary progressive MS: symptoms that slowly worsen, usually following relapsing-remitting MS.
- Primary progressive MS: steady worsening from the start, with no remissions. It is less common.
Most people with MS live into old age, though average life expectancy is a few years shorter than in the general population (NHS). The 2024 revision of the diagnostic criteria offers one framework for relapsing and progressive disease at any age (Montalban et al. 2025).
Symptoms and red flags
Common symptoms are fatigue, vision problems, numbness or tingling, dizziness or poor coordination, muscle cramps or stiffness, bladder control problems, memory and concentration problems, and sexual problems (NHS). These have many other causes, so the NHS advises seeing a GP rather than assuming MS.
A relapse, as defined in NICE's guideline, means new symptoms or worsening of old ones lasting more than 24 hours, without infection or another cause, after a stable period of at least a month. NICE says infection (especially urinary and respiratory) must be ruled out first, and that not every relapse needs steroids (NICE NG220, as summarised in search extracts, because the NICE site blocked us from opening the full page).
- Sudden weakness or numbness in one arm, loss or blurring of vision, or balance and coordination problems: call 999 or go to A&E, as these can signal a stroke (NHS). Our guide to stroke covers the emergency signs.
- Symptoms that worsen over days with fever, urinary symptoms or a chest infection: these can mimic a relapse, so a clinician should check for infection first (NICE NG220).
- New neurological symptoms in someone on natalizumab: PML must be excluded before treatment continues (EMA).
Causes and risk factors
The cause is unclear. The NHS lists higher risk in people aged 20 to 50, women, people with a close relative with MS, smokers (about twice as likely) and people who have had Epstein-Barr virus (NHS). The strongest single finding is from a US military cohort of more than 10 million young adults: among 955 who developed MS, risk rose 32-fold after Epstein-Barr infection and not after other viruses such as cytomegalovirus (Bjornevik et al. 2022). That study was paid for by the US National Institutes of Health and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. It shows a strong link, not what to do about it.
Low vitamin D and low sunlight exposure have also been linked to MS risk (PrevANZ abstract). Whether taking vitamin D once MS has begun changes anything is a separate question, covered below.
Diagnosis: the McDonald criteria
There is no single test. A GP refers to a neurologist, who may use examination, blood tests, MRI, lumbar puncture and nerve response tests (NHS). Specialists use the McDonald criteria, which require evidence of damage in different parts of the nervous system (dissemination in space) and at different times (dissemination in time), and no better explanation.
- 2017 revision: spinal fluid bands (oligoclonal bands) can support the diagnosis in people with a typical first episode who already show dissemination in space; symptomatic lesions and cortical lesions can count (Thompson et al., Lancet Neurol 2018).
- 2024 revision: the optic nerve becomes a fifth region; the central vein sign, paramagnetic rim lesions and spinal fluid kappa free light chains can give supportive evidence; certain people with silent MRI findings (radiologically isolated syndrome) can meet criteria; there is guidance for people aged 50 or over and those with other illnesses (Montalban et al. 2025). The panel was convened by ECTRIMS and the National MS Society (Practical Neurology), which are also its listed funders.
Earlier diagnosis helps people start treatment sooner. It also widens the pool of people who may be offered expensive drugs. We could not find independent data on how many people the 2024 changes will newly include.
Treatments: what works and what does not
| Treatment or claim | Verdict | Evidence | Key caveat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steroids for a relapse (oral or intravenous) | WORKS | Oral and intravenous methylprednisolone gave similar recovery at day 28 (COPOUSEP). NICE's key recommendation is oral methylprednisolone 0.5 g daily for 5 days. | Speeds recovery from a relapse; does not change the long-term course. Insomnia is common. |
| DMTs to reduce relapses in relapsing-remitting MS | WORKS | Relapse reductions of about 16% to 47% over 2 years, larger for the high-efficacy drugs (Cochrane 2024). | Strongest drugs carry the most serious risks. Evidence beyond 2 years is thin. |
| Anti-CD20 antibodies (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab) | WORKS | Better than interferon beta-1a and teriflunomide respectively in maker-funded trials (OPERA; ASCLEPIOS). | The comparators were not the strongest drugs available. NICE found no head-to-head data against other listed treatments for ofatumumab (TA699). |
| Ocrelizumab for primary progressive MS | MIXED | Modest slowing of disability progression (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98) (ORATORIO). | NICE said how much and for how long it helps is uncertain (NICE statement, 2019). |
| Rituximab (older, cheaper anti-CD20 antibody) | WORKS (EARLY) | Beat dimethyl fumarate and matched ocrelizumab on MRI in two public trials (RIFUND-MS; OVERLORD-MS). | We could not verify its licensing for MS in each country, so availability varies. |
| Stem cell transplant (AHSCT) | NOT YET SHOWN | Three randomised trials versus top DMTs are under way (RAM-MS; STAR-MS; BEAT-MS). | Treatment-related risks are significant; results are not expected before late 2026 to 2027 by the sources we found. |
| Vitamin D supplements | INSUFFICIENT | Mostly null trials, one positive French trial. | See supplements section below. |
| Diets (low-fat, ketogenic, Mediterranean and others) | INSUFFICIENT | No reliable evidence of disease benefit (Cochrane 2020). | Small trials, high risk of bias. |
| Medicines and rehabilitation for symptoms | MIXED | The NHS lists medicines for spasms, pain, vision and walking, plus fatigue advice, physiotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy, cognitive rehabilitation and bladder and bowel help (NHS). | Evidence quality varies by symptom; decisions are individual. |
Medicines in detail
Relapse treatment
Steroids shorten relapses. In COPOUSEP, 199 people with relapsing-remitting MS had 1000 mg of methylprednisolone daily for 3 days, by mouth or by drip, in a double-blind non-inferiority trial. Improvement by day 28 without further treatment was 81% (oral) versus 80% (intravenous), with a difference of 0.5% (90% CI −9.5 to 10.4); insomnia was more frequent with oral treatment (77% versus 64%) (COPOUSEP). The trial was funded by the French Health Ministry, a French MS charity and Teva. A Cochrane review of five small trials (215 people) agreed that oral steroids may be a practical alternative (Burton et al. 2012). NICE's key recommendation is oral methylprednisolone 0.5 g daily for 5 days, with intravenous treatment if oral steroids fail or admission is needed (NICE NG220, from search extracts). These are doses studied or stated by NICE, not instructions.
Interferons and glatiramer acetate
These older injectable drugs reduce relapses by about 16% over 2 years (interferon beta-1a RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91; glatiramer RR 0.84, 0.76 to 0.93), less than the stronger drugs, and more people stopped glatiramer than placebo because of side effects (OR 1.48), while the interferon estimate was borderline (Cochrane 2024). NICE appraised interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b and glatiramer in TA527 (NICE MS product list); we could not open the full recommendation. Glatiramer's maker, Teva, appears in the funding section below.
Natalizumab
In AFFIRM, 942 people had natalizumab or placebo for up to 116 weeks; relapses fell 68% at one year and disability progression fell 42% (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77) (AFFIRM, NEJM 2006). Its Europe PMC record lists a Multiple Sclerosis Society grant, while ClinicalTrials.gov names a Biogen employee as study director (registry entry), so we treat it as a manufacturer-linked trial. NICE recommends natalizumab only for rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting MS, defined as 2 or more relapses in the previous year plus baseline MRI activity (NICE TA127, wording from search extracts). The key danger is PML, a rare brain infection caused by the JC virus. The EMA says higher-risk people (JC virus antibody positive, treated for more than 2 years, with prior immunosuppressant use or a high antibody index) should continue only if benefits outweigh risks, with more frequent MRI (for example every 3 to 6 months) to be considered (EMA 2016).
Cladribine
CLARITY randomised 1,326 people to cladribine tablets or placebo for 96 weeks. Relapse rates were 0.14 and 0.15 on the two doses versus 0.33 on placebo, and the hazard ratio for 3-month disability progression was 0.67 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.93) at the lower dose. Lymphopenia occurred in 21.6% (lower dose) versus 1.8% on placebo, and herpes zoster in 8 and 12 patients versus none (CLARITY, NEJM 2010). The Europe PMC record has no funding text; four authors were affiliated with Merck Serono, and the drug is marketed by EMD Serono, a Merck KGaA affiliate (BioSpace, EMD Serono release). NICE TA616 recommends cladribine for highly active disease in two defined situations, noting that its effectiveness is not proven but it is likely to beat placebo (NICE TA616, from search extracts). A newer appraisal, TA1053, was published on 15 April 2025; we could not read its outcome.
Ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and rituximab
In OPERA (821 and 835 people), ocrelizumab cut the annualised relapse rate from 0.29 to 0.16 against interferon beta-1a, with infusion reactions in 34.3% (OPERA, funded by Roche). NICE recommended it for active relapsing-remitting MS only if alemtuzumab is unsuitable and the company's discount scheme applies; the list price was £4,790 per 300 mg vial (NICE TA533, from search extracts). For early primary progressive MS, NICE reversed an earlier refusal after a lower, confidential price was agreed with NHS England; the list price was £19,160 per patient per year (NICE statement, May 2019). Ofatumumab was recommended for active relapsing-remitting MS under a simple discount scheme, with NICE noting indirect comparisons suggesting similar effect to ocrelizumab and no direct head-to-head trial (NICE TA699). In ASCLEPIOS (Novartis-funded), the annualised relapse rate was 0.11 versus 0.22 in one trial and 0.10 versus 0.25 in the other against teriflunomide, and serious infections were 2.5% versus 1.8% (ASCLEPIOS). Rituximab has public-trial support, discussed above, and a 2021 Cochrane review identified 5 randomised and 10 non-randomised studies (16,429 people), noting pharmaceutical funding for two of them (Cochrane 2021).
Alemtuzumab
The EMA restricted alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) in November 2019 to adults whose disease stays highly active despite at least one DMT or who have rapidly worsening disease, barred its use in people with certain heart, circulation or bleeding disorders or non-MS autoimmune disorders, and required hospital settings with intensive care access, after reports of serious events including deaths (EMA 2019).
Other options and the stem cell question
NICE has also appraised ponesimod (TA767) and diroximel fumarate (TA794) (NICE MS product list); we could not open their full text. Autologous stem cell transplantation is being tested against alemtuzumab, cladribine, ocrelizumab and ofatumumab in RAM-MS (about 100 people, Norway), StarMS (about 94 people, UK) and BEAT-MS (156 people, US). The UK MS Society reports StarMS results are expected in 2027 (MS Society), and RAM-MS lists primary completion for November 2026 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Symptom management
The NHS lists medicines for spasms, pain, vision and walking, and non-drug care: fatigue advice, physiotherapy, mobility aids, cognitive behavioural therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, and bladder, bowel and sexual health support (NHS). For cannabis-based spray for spasticity, NICE's cannabis guideline allows a 4-week trial in moderate to severe MS spasticity when other medicines have failed, continuing only if symptoms fall by at least 20% on a 0 to 10 scale (NICE NG144, from search extracts). Search summaries also say NICE does not recommend fampridine for mobility because of cost-effectiveness; we could not confirm this from the page itself. See our guides on sleep and neurological disease, amitriptyline, duloxetine and pregabalin for nerve pain and related symptoms.
Supplements, diet and lifestyle claims
Vitamin D
This is the most heavily promoted supplement in MS, and the evidence is split.
- Cochrane 2018: 12 trials and quasi-trials, 933 people (464 on vitamin D, 469 on comparators). No significant effect on annualised relapse rate, EDSS disability score or new enhancing lesions at 52 weeks, all very low quality. Serious and minor adverse effects did not increase (Cochrane summary; Jagannath et al.).
- SOLAR (Merck KGaA-funded): 229 people on interferon beta-1a took placebo or about 14,007 IU of vitamin D3 a day. No evidence of disease activity at 48 weeks was 36.3% versus 35.3% (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.63). MRI measures favoured vitamin D but were secondary (SOLAR).
- CHOLINE: 129 randomised, 90 completers. The primary endpoint, annualised relapse rate, was not met (rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.32). We read this through a review and could not verify the trial's own funding (Smolders et al., CNS Drugs 2019).
- PrevANZ (MS Australia-funded): 204 people after a first attack with high-risk MRI took placebo or 1,000, 5,000 or 10,000 IU a day. Conversion to MS by 48 weeks occurred in 58%, with hazard ratios against placebo of 0.87, 1.37 and 1.28 (all with intervals spanning 1). Vitamin D3 was safe (PrevANZ; MS Australia).
- D-Lay MS (French Ministry of Health-funded): 316 people after a first attack took 100,000 IU of vitamin D3 or placebo every 2 weeks for 24 months. Disease activity occurred in 60.3% versus 74.1% (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.87, P = 0.004). The relapse difference alone was not significant (17.9% versus 21.8%, HR 0.69, P = 0.16). Participants had low baseline vitamin D (median 45 nmol/L, with 22.4% below 30 nmol/L). The authors list limits including exploratory secondary results (D-Lay MS; full text).
What this means: the one positive trial was in people with low vitamin D after a first episode, and the negative trials mostly enrolled people with higher levels or established disease. That is a reasonable idea, not a proven one, and no trial replaced a DMT with vitamin D. Doses above are trial doses, not advice. See our general guide to vitamin D for safety limits and deficiency testing.
Diet
The 2020 Cochrane review of dietary interventions covered 30 trials (11 on polyunsaturated fats, 10 on antioxidants, 3 on whole-diet programmes and 6 on other supplements). Polyunsaturated versus monounsaturated fats showed no difference in relapses (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.20; very low certainty), and antioxidants versus placebo showed none either (RR 0.98, 0.59 to 1.64; low certainty). The authors concluded there is insufficient evidence for any dietary intervention (Parks et al. 2020). Newer small randomised trials of fasting, ketogenic and anti-inflammatory diets exist, but we could not open them, so we do not grade their results. See also omega-3.
Smoking, exercise and mood
The NHS lists smoking as roughly doubling risk. We did not find a trustworthy source for stopping smoking altering the course once MS has started, so we make no claim. For general support see our guides on exercise and social support for mental health, CBT and mindfulness. NICE's guideline covers fatigue, cognition, mood and sleep within its comprehensive review, with depression and anxiety handled under separate guidelines (NICE NG220, from search extracts).
Risks and side effects
- Infections: serious infections occurred in 1.3% on ocrelizumab versus 2.9% on interferon in OPERA, and 2.5% on ofatumumab versus 1.8% on teriflunomide in ASCLEPIOS. Both are maker-funded and only ran about 2 years.
- Cancer signals: neoplasms were 2.3% on ocrelizumab versus 0.8% on placebo in ORATORIO and 0.5% versus 0.2% in OPERA. The trials were too short to settle long-term cancer risk, as OPERA's authors noted.
- PML with natalizumab: rare, serious, and tied to JC virus status and treatment length (EMA).
- Alemtuzumab: stroke and heart events within days of dosing, and immune conditions months later (EMA).
- Cladribine: low lymphocyte counts in 21.6% and shingles (CLARITY).
- Infusion and injection reactions: 34.3% with ocrelizumab, 20.2% with ofatumumab.
- Stopping early: Cochrane found people stopped many DMTs because of side effects more often than placebo, for example fingolimod (OR 1.84), teriflunomide (OR 1.82) and glatiramer (OR 1.48) (Cochrane 2024).
We have not reviewed interactions, vaccination timing or pregnancy planning in this article. These decisions need an MS specialist, and we found no source we could open that addresses them well, so we say nothing further.
Who to see
A GP refers suspected MS to a neurologist (NHS). NICE's guideline expects a comprehensive review of fatigue, cognition, sleep, vision, mood and respiratory function, and a person's DMT choice sits with their MS specialist team. People with a relapse should have it assessed by a clinician with MS expertise before steroids, because infection must be excluded and not every relapse needs treatment (NICE NG220).
Follow the money: who makes the drugs and who funded the evidence
Who makes and sells MS drugs
- Roche (Switzerland): funded the OPERA and ORATORIO trials of ocrelizumab. Roche's January 2026 results named Ocrevus among the top growth drivers of its pharmaceuticals division (Roche, 2025 results). We could not find the exact Ocrevus sales figure.
- Novartis (Switzerland): funded ASCLEPIOS; the paper lists Novartis staff in Basel and East Hanover, New Jersey (ASCLEPIOS).
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany), with EMD Serono: funded SOLAR and is linked to cladribine tablets (SOLAR; BioSpace).
- Biogen (US): its Tysabri was the subject of AFFIRM (study director affiliation per ClinicalTrials.gov) and, with Avonex and Tecfidera, of the settlement below.
- Teva (Israel and US): maker of Copaxone (glatiramer) and a co-funder of COPOUSEP.
Prices
In the US, nine DMTs tracked from 1993 to 2013 rose in price at 5 to 7 times the rate of prescription drug inflation. First-generation drugs went from $8,000 to $11,000 to about $60,000 a year; newer drugs commonly launched 25% to 60% above existing ones; and US prices were roughly 2 to 3 times those in the UK, Canada and Australia (Hartung et al. 2015). Natalizumab launched at $25,850 a year in 2004 and fingolimod at $50,775 in 2010 (same paper). In the UK, ocrelizumab's list price was £4,790 a vial, with discounts that NICE and the company keep confidential (NICE TA533). Rituximab, off patent, is the contrast: the Bergen group says its low cost saves the Norwegian health system about NOK 500 million a year, a figure from their own release that we did not verify (Bergen).
Who funded the evidence
Each pivotal trial for a new brand-name drug was paid for by its maker. Publicly or charity-funded trials exist for steroids, rituximab and vitamin D, partly because no company has an incentive to test a cheap or off-patent product. That means independent evidence is thinnest exactly where it would save the most money. The Cochrane analysis rated sponsor influence as high risk in 68% of studies and noted that most agents' effects were measured only to 24 months (Cochrane 2024). A Cochrane group says this same review underpinned the first three MS drugs entering the 2023 WHO Essential Medicines List (Cochrane MS group), which shows how far the public reviews feed policy.
Documented integrity events
- Biogen, September 2022: agreed to pay about $900 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations that from 2009 to March 2014 it paid speaker honoraria, consulting fees and meals to induce prescribing of Avonex, Tysabri and Tecfidera. The settlement resolves allegations only. A former employee brought the case (US Department of Justice; trade summary in Becker's).
- Teva, October 2024: was reported to agree to pay $450 million across two matters, $425 million of it for allegations that donations to two copay charities helped Medicare patients afford Copaxone while its price rose. Teva did not admit wrongdoing (Fierce Pharma; HealthExec). Earlier, the complaint said Copaxone's price went from about $17,000 to more than $73,000 a year (PolicyMed).
- Lemtrada, 2019: EU restrictions after reports of deaths and serious events, described above.
Research funding at a glance
15 sources graded. The counts below are the independence tiers assigned in the scorecard above. They count sources, not funding amounts or evidence quality.
Public funding alone does not prove independence, and commercial funding alone does not prove a claim false. Named funders, countries and relationships are in the scorecard and source notes.
What this means: the claim that MS drugs reduce relapses stands up even with sponsor bias, because regulators, Cochrane and public trials broadly agree. The claims that are hardest to check are long-term disability benefit, comparisons between expensive brands, and real prices. Those depend mostly on company-funded trials and confidential discounts. Vitamin D is an area where the money works the other way: no one sells it as an MS drug, so charities and ministries paid for the trials, and the results disagree.
Related research
For wider, evidence-graded context, see these Pure City Research guides:
- Vitamin D: D2 vs D3, deficiency, benefits and safety
- Sleep and neurological disease
- Stroke: emergency signs and treatment
- Omega-3: fish oil, krill, algal
- Amitriptyline: independent evidence
- Duloxetine: independent evidence
- Pregabalin: independent evidence
- Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)
- Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and MBSR
- Exercise and social support for mental health
- Depression in older adults
- Crohn's disease: another immune-driven condition
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between relapsing and progressive MS?
Relapsing-remitting MS has flare-ups followed by recovery, while secondary progressive MS slowly worsens, usually after a relapsing phase. Primary progressive MS worsens steadily from the start, without remissions (NHS). Most trial evidence is in relapsing disease. For primary progressive MS, ocrelizumab is the only drug with a positive trial, and the benefit was modest (HR 0.76) (ORATORIO).
How is MS diagnosed?
A neurologist uses examination, MRI, sometimes a lumbar puncture and other tests, applying the McDonald criteria. The 2024 revision made the optic nerve a fifth region and accepted new markers such as kappa free light chains (Montalban et al. 2025; NHS).
Does vitamin D treat MS?
Not proven. A Cochrane review found no effect, two large trials (SOLAR and PrevANZ) were negative, and one French trial in people after a first attack found less disease activity (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.87) (Cochrane; D-Lay MS). Ask an MS team before using high doses.
Is there an MS diet that works?
No diet has reliable evidence of changing the disease. The Cochrane review of 30 trials judged the evidence uncertain, with all trials at unknown or high risk of bias (Cochrane 2020).
Which MS drug is the strongest?
Over two years, natalizumab, cladribine and alemtuzumab had the best-supported relapse reductions (RR 0.53 to 0.57 versus placebo) in the Cochrane analysis (Cochrane 2024). Anti-CD20 antibodies perform well against weaker comparators in maker-funded trials. "Strongest" and "safest" are not the same, and the choice belongs with a specialist.
Can steroids at home replace a hospital drip for a relapse?
In a double-blind trial, oral methylprednisolone was not inferior to intravenous (81% versus 80% improved by day 28), though insomnia was more common (COPOUSEP). A clinician should first confirm it is a relapse and not an infection (NICE NG220).
Why are MS drugs so expensive?
Companies set prices for patented drugs, and US prices of MS drugs rose far faster than general drug prices between 1993 and 2013 (Hartung et al.). Off-patent rituximab is much cheaper and performed well in public trials. We cannot say what any health system pays, because discounts are confidential.
Will stem cell transplants replace drugs?
Not yet. Randomised trials against the best drugs (RAM-MS, StarMS and BEAT-MS) have not published primary results in the sources we found, with some expected in 2026 to 2027 (MS Society).
Sources and funding notes
What we could not verify: NICE's website blocked automated reading, so NICE statements on NG220, TA533, TA616, TA699, TA127 and NG144 come from search-result extracts, not the full pages. We could not read the full recommendation text of TA527, TA767, TA794 or TA1053. We saw no funding text for the Cochrane DMT, vitamin D, diet, steroid or rituximab reviews, or for the CLARITY and 2017 McDonald records. We could not open the US Department of Justice pages directly (Biogen details are from the search extract and trade coverage). We checked OVERLORD-MS against its PubMed abstract (218 randomised; no new or enlarging T2 lesions in 92.2% on rituximab versus 94.8% on ocrelizumab, risk difference -2.6 points, 95% CI -9.4 to 4.3), but not the full text, and infections were more common on rituximab (82% versus 69%). We did not open the recent diet trials, the original CHOLINE paper, any Roche sales table, or the MS Society prevalence page (it blocked us). We did not check how NICE, EMA or Cochrane are funded. The Teva figures ($450 million in total, $425 million of it for the Copaxone copay matter, no admission of wrongdoing) and the Biogen figure (about $900 million, no admission of liability) were each corroborated by several law-firm and trade reports, but we could not open the Department of Justice releases themselves. We made no claims on pregnancy, vaccines, exercise trials or interaction data.
- NHS. Multiple sclerosis — patient information; UK National Health Service.
- NICE NG220. Multiple sclerosis in adults: management — UK guideline; public body (read via search extracts).
- NICE TA533. Ocrelizumab for relapsing-remitting MS; TA585 (primary progressive); TA699 (ofatumumab); TA616 (cladribine); TA127 (natalizumab); MS product list — NICE technology appraisals; public body; company discounts confidential.
- NICE. Lower price for MS drug paves the way for positive recommendation (May 2019) — NICE news statement via a government news aggregator.
- NICE NG144. Cannabis-based medicinal products — UK guideline; public body (search extract).
- Thompson et al. Diagnosis of MS: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018 — expert panel; funding not in record.
- Montalban et al. Diagnosis of MS: 2024 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2025; Practical Neurology summary — expert panel; National MS Society and ECTRIMS.
- Gonzalez-Lorenzo et al. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting MS: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane 2024; Cochrane MS group note — systematic review; funding not in record.
- Hauser et al. OPERA I and II. NEJM 2017 — pivotal trial; funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.
- Montalban et al. ORATORIO. NEJM 2017 — pivotal trial; funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.
- Hauser et al. ASCLEPIOS I and II. NEJM 2020 — pivotal trial; funded by Novartis.
- Giovannoni et al. CLARITY. NEJM 2010 — pivotal trial; no funding text in record; authors from Merck Serono.
- Polman et al. AFFIRM. NEJM 2006; registry entry — pivotal trial; MS Society grant listed; Biogen study director per registry.
- Svenningsson et al. RIFUND-MS. Lancet Neurol 2022 — public trial; Swedish Research Council.
- Haukeland University Hospital. OVERLORD-MS in NEJM; HealthDay summary — hospital release and news; public funding (KLINBEFORSK).
- Cochrane. Rituximab for people with MS (2021) — systematic review; funding not in record.
- Le Page et al. COPOUSEP. Lancet 2015; Burton et al. Cochrane 2012 — steroid evidence; French Health Ministry, Ligue Française contre la SEP and Teva (COPOUSEP).
- Jagannath et al. Vitamin D for the management of MS. Cochrane 2018; Cochrane summary — systematic review; funding not in record.
- Hupperts et al. SOLAR. Neurology 2019 — Merck KGaA-funded trial.
- Smolders et al. An update on vitamin D and disease activity in MS. CNS Drugs 2019 — review of CHOLINE; no targeted funding.
- Butzkueven et al. PrevANZ. Brain 2024; MS Australia announcement — MS Australia (charity).
- D-Lay MS. JAMA 2025; full text — French Ministry of Health grant.
- Parks et al. Dietary interventions for MS-related outcomes. Cochrane 2020 — systematic review; no grants listed.
- Bjornevik et al. Epstein-Barr virus and MS. Science 2022 — US NIH (NINDS) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
- EMA. Tysabri and PML (2016); EMA. Lemtrada (2019) — EU regulator.
- RAM-MS registry; BEAT-MS registry; StarMS registry; MS Society on stem cell trials — trial registries; hospital, government institute (NIAID) and charity.
- Hartung et al. The cost of MS drugs in the US. Neurology 2015 — price analysis; no targeted funding.
- US Department of Justice. Biogen settlement (2022); Becker's — government press release (search extract); trade press.
- Fierce Pharma. Teva settlement (2024); HealthExec; PolicyMed — trade press (search extracts).
- Roche. 2025 results; BioSpace. EMD Serono CLARITY release — company announcements.
- MS International Federation. Atlas of MS; MS Society UK — patient federation and charity; donation funded.
Educational research reviewed 6 October 2026. This article is not medical advice; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist before starting, stopping or combining treatments.
Have a question — or want us to cover something?
Ask about anything on this page, or request the next deep dive: an ingredient, a supplement, or a health concern. We use published research, evidence syntheses, and regulatory guidance, with clear source links.
One daily research roundup
Get the topics, key findings and links from our new articles in one email. At most one digest a day, only when there is something new.
