What is Hodgkin lymphoma? Hodgkin lymphoma is cancer arising in the lymph system. NCI definition. Biopsy identifies the actual disease; subtype, extent and overall health inform specialist care.
Confidence: moderate to high for these selected diagnostic and safety distinctions. Care descriptions are attributed clinical context; independently cleared superiority of an individual drug or supplement is not established by this review.
- Keep the complete pathology name; classical disease and NLPHL need distinct interpretation.
- A referral, symptom checklist or PET finding is not a substitute for tissue diagnosis.
- Selected NLPHL observation is not general advice to delay classical Hodgkin care.
- Fertility and later health effects belong in the treatment discussion and follow-up record.
Table of contents
- Evidence summary
- What Hodgkin lymphoma is: classical disease and NLPHL are different
- Names on newer reports: NLPHL and nodular lymphocyte-predominant B-cell lymphoma
- Symptoms: painless nodes, sweats, itch and symptoms after alcohol
- Diagnosis: tissue examination comes before a treatment label
- Staging and PET response: extent is different from subtype
- Treatment families: chemotherapy, radiation and selected immune or targeted care
- During treatment: infection, breathing changes and immune inflammation
- Fertility and follow-up: care continues after the lymphoma response
- Nutrition and supplements: supportive care is not lymphoma control
- Individual prescribing, pregnancy and research limits
- Funding and source roles
- Frequently asked questions
- Sources and funding notes
Evidence summary
Clinical descriptions, care guidance and independently established treatment outcomes have different evidentiary roles. The table identifies what the reviewed sources can support and which financial or clinical questions remain unresolved.
| Question / approach | Evidence reviewed | Funding / conflicts | Interpretation / limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biopsy and extent | NHS tests; NCI professional PDQ | National public/gift routes; NCI lead’s private-provider relationship traced separately. | Tissue, staging and response have different roles; no personal scan algorithm. |
| Classical versus nodular lymphocyte-predominant | WHO; ICC | OA support and separately dated author ties; historical CAC finance verified separately. | Classification naming context only; distinct entity is not completed by this overview. |
| Treatment families | NHS treatment | Public website funding does not clear the underlying intervention trials. | Selected clinical care context; no independently cleared regimen ranking. |
| Late effects and support | NCI patient PDQ; Follow-up | NCI institutional and named-reviewer finance kept separate. | Care depends on actual treatment exposures; no prognosis or screening schedule. |
What Hodgkin lymphoma is: classical disease and NLPHL are different
Hodgkin lymphoma is cancer of lymphocytes, white blood cells involved in immune defense. NHS distinguishes classical Hodgkin lymphoma from nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, or NLPHL. NHS disease and type context. A patient needs the actual pathology name, not just the word “lymphoma.”
Classical disease has sparse Hodgkin/Reed–Sternberg cells among surrounding immune cells. Tissue subtypes are nodular sclerosis, mixed cellularity, lymphocyte-rich and lymphocyte-depleted. WHO pathology. Feeling a lump cannot identify the subtype.
The adult guide concentrates on classical disease while explaining the NLPHL boundary. It does not complete the separate nodular lymphocyte-predominant B-cell lymphoma, mediastinal grey-zone lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma or childhood care pathways. A similar symptom or a shared source destination does not make these diagnoses equivalent.
Names on newer reports: NLPHL and nodular lymphocyte-predominant B-cell lymphoma
WHO 2022 retains NLPHL but accepts the B-cell name; ICC 2022 uses nodular lymphocyte-predominant B-cell lymphoma. WHO naming; ICC naming. The terminology difference does not mean a second cancer developed.
Obtain the full biopsy report, its classification system and any specialist review. The important question is whether the actual disease is classical Hodgkin lymphoma, the nodular lymphocyte-predominant entity, or another mimic. A short name on an appointment letter can leave out that distinction.
NHS information describes clinician-led observation as a possible option for selected slow-growing NLPHL. NHS subtype-specific observation. Do not transfer that option to classical Hodgkin lymphoma or postpone assessment because an online source describes a related condition as indolent. A change in terminology needs explanation by the pathology and lymphoma teams.
Symptoms: painless nodes, sweats, itch and symptoms after alcohol
A painless neck, armpit or groin lump can occur alongside fever, night sweats, itching, weight loss or breathlessness. NHS also describes pain in glands after alcohol. NHS symptom recognition. These symptoms have other causes; they do not establish Hodgkin lymphoma.
Arrange assessment of persistent, unexplained or changing symptoms. Drinking alcohol to see whether a gland hurts is not a diagnostic test. Record the lump’s location, when it appeared and changes in symptoms, and bring relevant previous results. Photographs or a self-measured size do not replace examination.
An urgent referral means further investigation is needed, not that cancer has been proved. NHS referral distinction. Follow the referral instructions and contact the responsible service if there is uncertainty about the next step. Severe breathing difficulty or collapse needs emergency care rather than waiting for a routine appointment.
Diagnosis: tissue examination comes before a treatment label
A lymph-node biopsy is the main NHS diagnostic test; additional blood tests, CT/PET imaging or marrow investigation may be considered for staging. NHS investigation roles. That list does not mean every person needs every procedure.
The professional NCI summary prefers excisional biopsy with qualified pathology interpretation. NCI tissue context. The method and sample adequacy matter. Ask whether the tissue can answer the actual subtype question and whether a specialist pathology review is needed before treatment planning.
Blood tests and a scan answer different questions from tissue classification. Ask the service to distinguish the finding that establishes the diagnosis from a test that checks general health or extent. Obtain its procedure-specific medicine and preparation instructions; this guide gives no fasting schedule, anticoagulant interruption or home biopsy interpretation.
Staging and PET response: extent is different from subtype
Staging maps disease extent; treatment grouping may also distinguish early favorable, early unfavorable and advanced disease. Fever, drenching sweats and unexplained weight loss form the “B symptoms” grouping. NCI stage and symptom-group context. A stage number alone is not a complete treatment plan.
PET response is useful clinical information, but false-positive results can occur. NCI PET limitation. Ask the team how it interprets the scan in the actual timing and treatment context. Do not treat every bright area as confirmed persistent lymphoma or change therapy from an online score table.
Keep subtype, extent, symptoms and response separate when discussing a result. This article does not supply a Deauville cutoff, personal risk calculator, PET timetable or percentage chance of cure. It also does not infer that improvement on a scan establishes the independent superiority of a particular treatment.
Treatment families: chemotherapy, radiation and selected immune or targeted care
NHS care may combine chemotherapy, radiotherapy and medicines directed at cancer cells; selected circumstances involve immunotherapy or stem-cell transplantation. NHS care-family context. Which families apply depends on the confirmed disease and clinical situation.
A plan should identify its purpose and the evidence behind the proposed combination. A comparison must consider disease control, symptoms, quality of life and immediate and later harms. The sources’ treatment descriptions are attributed clinical context; this review has not financially cleared every underlying trial and does not rank individual regimens.
For a newly diagnosed patient, a recurrence and a treatment that has not worked, the decision is not interchangeable. Obtain the names of the actual medicines and the reason for adding or omitting radiation. An older list of drugs or a related lymphoma’s schedule is not a substitute for the treating team’s current instructions.
During treatment: infection, breathing changes and immune inflammation
Possible infection during cancer treatment needs prompt contact with the oncology service; fever-reducing medicine can hide a warning. NCI infection precautions. Use the urgent-care plan, including after hours, rather than waiting for the next infusion or scan.
Immunotherapy can act against healthy tissues as well as cancer, and adverse effects may occur during or after treatment. NCI immune-side-effect context. Report new breathing problems, diarrhea or other changes to the treating service for assessment; do not assume they are minor because a medicine is called immunotherapy.
Severe breathing difficulty, collapse, uncontrolled bleeding or a severe allergic reaction needs emergency help. Bring the treatment list and alert receiving clinicians to the cancer therapy. This guide supplies no home steroid, antibiotic, fever threshold or instruction to continue or withhold a cancer medicine without the responsible service’s advice.
Fertility and follow-up: care continues after the lymphoma response
Treatment may have later effects involving fertility, thyroid, heart or lung health, or second cancers. NCI late-effect context. The relevant risks depend on what was actually received; another survivor’s history is not a personal screening schedule.
Discuss fertility before treatment where possible. NCI’s female fertility and male fertility resources explain that treatment and personal circumstances affect risk. Request specialist review if future parenting matters; no preservation procedure, exposure or later pregnancy is declared safe or effective here.
A written follow-up plan and treatment summary help coordinate care after treatment. NCI survivorship planning. Keep medicine names, radiation details and significant adverse effects with the record. The plan should address ongoing problems as well as possible recurrence; feeling well does not itself define which later assessments are appropriate.
Nutrition and supplements: supportive care is not lymphoma control
NCI separates nutrition support from unproven diet or supplement cancer-treatment claims. Nutrition and cancer boundary. A product sold for immune support, detoxification or recovery does not thereby demonstrate Hodgkin lymphoma control.
Food and supplement interactions depend on the actual anticancer medicine. NCI interaction context. Share all ingredient labels and nonprescription products with the oncology pharmacist, including products used only on treatment-free days. A vague “natural” label is insufficient for an interaction review.
Report difficulty eating, swallowing or maintaining intake so support addresses the actual problem. A dietitian’s nutrition plan and a treatment for lymphoma have different purposes. Do not replace prescribed cancer care with a restrictive diet or combine several online supplement protocols; this review establishes no independent supplement benefit for this diagnosis.
Individual prescribing, pregnancy and research limits
Pregnancy changes Hodgkin treatment planning and requires coordinated decisions. NCI pregnancy context. Contact the lymphoma and obstetric teams promptly if pregnancy is possible or confirmed. The older source’s specific drug-exposure reassurance is excluded; this article provides no pregnancy-safe regimen or self-directed interruption.
Obtain written medicine, infusion, missed-dose, vomiting and adverse-effect instructions. Dose, treatment length and scan timing are prescribed for the actual case. Changing a medicine because a lump shrank or a scan improved can bypass the very assessment that gives the result meaning.
The source map separates current clinical context, classification, dated funding declarations and unknown trial finance. A laboratory mechanism, animal experiment or biomarker change cannot establish human survival or quality-of-life benefit. Manufacturer efficacy is excluded from the independent verdict, and this overview does not complete every rare subtype or childhood pathway.
Funding and source roles
Who paid for the evidence?
Follow named sources to the funding and relationships disclosed in this article. Numbered article disclosures preserve notes where a source is not identified. A public or university name alone does not establish independence.
View 22 more funding disclosures
This graphic reorganizes the article's disclosures; it is not a new financial audit or independence classification. Highlighted notes show different funding relationships where available. Review funding is separate from underlying trial funding. Disclosure is not proof of falsehood, and no declared conflict is not proof of complete independence.
The source-specific map separates documented institutional funding from disease-page payments and trial sponsorship. Unknown allocations remain unknown. A public agency, charity or academic address does not by itself establish independent treatment efficacy.
| Source | Funding / backers | Country / jurisdiction | Independence | Credibility / incentives / gaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCI: adult Hodgkin patient PDQ | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. Named reviewer’s private oncology service is separate from unknown PDQ payments. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 3 connected named reviewer, provisional; clinical context. | C, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Updated 27 February 2025. Derived reviewer connection below. Numerical outcomes, treatment sequences and exposure reassurance excluded. PDQ is an information summary, not a treatment guideline. |
| NCI: adult Hodgkin professional PDQ | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. Named reviewer’s private oncology service is separate from unknown PDQ payments. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 3 connected named reviewer, provisional; clinical context. | C, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Updated 12 February 2025. No drug efficacy or personal PET algorithm adopted. PDQ is an information summary, not a treatment guideline. |
| NHS: what Hodgkin lymphoma is | National website policy documents DHSC funds and no corporate sponsorship or advertising. Page receipts unknown. | United Kingdom; national NHS patient website, separate from provider trusts. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional. | B, provisional — clinical accountability supports accuracy; Reviewed 14 October 2025; due October 2028. Simplification and source-study/contributor interests remain unclosed. |
| NHS: Hodgkin symptoms | National website policy documents DHSC funds and no corporate sponsorship or advertising. Page receipts unknown. | United Kingdom; national NHS patient website, separate from provider trusts. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional. | B, provisional — clinical accountability supports accuracy; Reviewed 14 October 2025; due October 2028. Simplification and source-study/contributor interests remain unclosed. |
| NHS: Hodgkin tests | National website policy documents DHSC funds and no corporate sponsorship or advertising. Page receipts unknown. | United Kingdom; national NHS patient website, separate from provider trusts. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional. | B, provisional — clinical accountability supports accuracy; Reviewed 14 October 2025; due October 2028. Simplification and source-study/contributor interests remain unclosed. |
| NHS: Hodgkin treatment | National website policy documents DHSC funds and no corporate sponsorship or advertising. Page receipts unknown. | United Kingdom; national NHS patient website, separate from provider trusts. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional. | B, provisional — clinical accountability supports accuracy; Reviewed 14 October 2025; due October 2028. Simplification and source-study/contributor interests remain unclosed. |
| NCI: infection during treatment | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional; supporting trials not financially cleared. | B, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Reviewed 23 January 2020; dated safety context. Page and contributor receipts, and underlying-study finances, are unclosed. |
| NCI: immunotherapy side effects | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional; supporting trials not financially cleared. | B, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Reviewed 16 February 2023. Page and contributor receipts, and underlying-study finances, are unclosed. |
| NCI: female fertility | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional; supporting trials not financially cleared. | B, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Updated 14 May 2025. Page and contributor receipts, and underlying-study finances, are unclosed. |
| NCI: male fertility | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional; supporting trials not financially cleared. | B, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Updated 14 May 2025. Page and contributor receipts, and underlying-study finances, are unclosed. |
| NCI: follow-up medical care | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional; supporting trials not financially cleared. | B, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Updated 2 December 2024. Page and contributor receipts, and underlying-study finances, are unclosed. |
| NCI: nutrition and cancer claims | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional; supporting trials not financially cleared. | B, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Posted 30 October 2024. Page and contributor receipts, and underlying-study finances, are unclosed. |
| NCI: food and supplement interactions | Congressional funds; separate public gift route. Exact page and study allocations unknown. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 2 clinical context, provisional; supporting trials not financially cleared. | B, provisional — public accountability and medical review favor accuracy; Updated 25 April 2024. Page and contributor receipts, and underlying-study finances, are unclosed. PDQ is an information summary, not a treatment guideline. |
| NCI budget and appropriations, May 2026 | Congressional funding through HHS/NIH. Enacted appropriations and future requests differ; no disease-page amount assigned. | United States; NCI/NIH/HHS, Bethesda, Maryland. | Tier 3 institutional financial self-report. | B, provisional — actual budget process and dated body read; fiscal accountability, budget priorities and missing page allocation. |
| NCI Gift Fund and contribution routes, August 2025 | Public gifts/Gift Fund and Breast Cancer Research Stamp route separate from Congress. Named page donors and complete accepted receipts unclosed. | United States; 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland; federal NCI. | Tier 3 institutional financial self-report. | B, provisional — actual contribution and headquarters text read; no named donor control or page sponsorship inferred. |
| NCI PDQ editorial boards, November 2022 | NCI support; non-government member honoraria/travel expenses. Declarations and recusal required; specific conflicts not publicly required. | United States; NCI, Bethesda, with international board contributors. | Tier 3 institutional process and payment self-report. | B, provisional — actual dated policy read; editorial independence does not clear member interests or sponsored underlying trials. |
| NHS national content policy, October 2022 | DHSC funding; policy states no advertising or corporate sponsorship. Full page/expert receipts unclosed. | United Kingdom; national NHS website. | Tier 3 financial/editorial self-report. | B, provisional — actual funding/accuracy policy read; next review due October 2025 passed. Not a provider-trust accounts profile. |
| Greenspring Personal Oncology: Seifter service identity | Own page identifies Seifter as oncology lead and lists commercial insurers, Medicare and patient billing. Actual receipts and PDQ payments unknown. | United States; 2328 West Joppa Road, Lutherville, Maryland. | Tier 4 provider promotion; identity only. | D for independent efficacy; C for identity — undated own page. No audited income, manufacturer-payment or disease-page sponsor inferred. |
| WHO lymphoid classification, 2022 | Original: Projekt DEAL open-access support; no competing interests declared. Separate 2025 coauthor interests do not establish 2022 payments. | International authors; corresponding authors United Kingdom, United States and Germany. | Tier 3 known separately connected coauthor; taxonomy only. | C, provisional — 22 June 2022. Expert classification; complete personal and production receipts unclosed. Authorship correction below. |
| WHO classification authorship correction, 2023 | Original correction declares no competing interests; no separate production-money statement found. It corrects authors and affiliations. | International authors; corrected affiliations include Italy and Japan. | Tier 3 financially connected author group; record correction only. | C, provisional — 19 July 2023 full correction read. No treatment or classification outcome inferred from its authorship amendment. |
| Campo et al.: International Consensus Classification, 2022 | NCI/NIAID intramural support; CAC funding refers to 2016 financial record. Authors declare no competing financial interests; allocations unclosed. | International authors; corresponding contacts Barcelona, Spain, and Bethesda, United States. | Tier 3 financially connected funding chain; taxonomy only. | C, provisional — 15 September 2022 issue, online 2 June. Full 25-page original selected sections read; old project chain and supporting studies not cleared. |
| Swerdlow et al.: cited 2016 financial chain | Primary acknowledgments verify charitable/university and drug/test-company support for the Chicago CAC meeting, 31 March–1 April 2014, including Genentech, Incyte and Celgene. | International authors; historical meeting Chicago, United States. | Tier 4 manufacturer-supported historical project; finance only. | D for efficacy; C for historical financial trace — 19 May 2016. Complete primary author copy’s financial footer verified; direct publisher access failed. No inference of identical 2022 sponsors or receipts. |
| ICC erratum record, 2023 | PubMed record identifies the original ICC authors and January 2023 Figure 4 correction; no separate production-funding statement present. | United States; NLM index, Bethesda; original authors international. | Tier 3 administrative record, provisional. | C, provisional — 26 January 2023. Actual record/figure legend read; complete publisher correction body unavailable. No amended image or grading claim adopted. |
| DEAL: publication-payment mechanism | Own description: institutional publication/read fees replace subscription payments; agreements with commercial publishers. Not funding of clinical research itself. | Germany; DEAL Open Access Services, Landsberger Strasse 346, Munich. | Tier 3 institutional financial self-report. | C, provisional — undated body. Publishing access/cost remit favors traceable information; exact 2022 article payer and ledger remain unclosed. |
| ELN 2025: separately dated Hochhaus interests | ELN meeting support, no commercial production funding declared. Hochhaus: Enliven/Incyte/Novartis honoraria and institutional company research, including BMS and Pfizer. | International authors; Hochhaus affiliation Jena, Germany. | Tier 3 connected authors; financial record only. | C, provisional — 11 July 2025 original declarations read. Later relationships are not proof of money for the 2022 classification. |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hodgkin lymphoma the same as non-Hodgkin lymphoma? No. They are different disease groups. The actual tissue diagnosis is needed before applying a care pathway.
Why might my report use NLPHL or a B-cell lymphoma name? Classification systems use different terminology for the nodular lymphocyte-predominant entity. The naming section explains the distinction; ask for the full pathology interpretation.
Does a painless lump prove lymphoma? No. Symptoms and referrals need investigation. Arrange assessment rather than using alcohol pain or a photograph as a diagnostic test.
Does a positive PET scan prove treatment failed? Not by itself. The lymphoma team must interpret the finding in context; this guide gives no personal scan-based treatment rule.
Can watch and wait be used for all Hodgkin lymphoma? No. The selected NLPHL option described above must not be transferred to classical disease or used to delay assessment.
Can I use supplements instead of chemotherapy? This review establishes no independent supplement control of Hodgkin lymphoma. Discuss products with oncology and continue the prescribed care plan.
Why do I need care after treatment ends? Response assessment and later health follow-up serve different purposes. Keep the actual treatment summary and the specialist’s individual follow-up plan.
Sources and funding notes
NCI patient derivation and professional lead Seifter were checked in the original pages; private-practice money is not PDQ payment. The 2023 WHO correction addresses author/institution omissions. ICC’s 2023 erratum record is noted without using the amended image; historical 2014 meeting finance was verified in the primary 2016 author copy. Classification sources supply no intervention efficacy. Numerical outcomes, drug sequences, personal preparation/scan schedules and blanket pregnancy-exposure reassurance are excluded.
- NCI: adult Hodgkin patient PDQ — Selected definition, symptom grouping, parenting and late-effect context.
- NCI: adult Hodgkin professional PDQ — Selected biopsy/staging limits and actual reviewer identity.
- NHS: what Hodgkin lymphoma is — Main disease versus its two named types.
- NHS: Hodgkin symptoms — Lump and symptom recognition; referral is not diagnosis.
- NHS: Hodgkin tests — Biopsy and possible staging investigations.
- NHS: Hodgkin treatment — Selected care families and NLPHL observation boundary.
- NCI: infection during treatment — Urgent infection precautions only.
- NCI: immunotherapy side effects — Immune inflammation and reporting boundary only.
- NCI: female fertility — Pre-treatment fertility review, without preservation efficacy.
- NCI: male fertility — Pre-treatment fertility review, without preservation efficacy.
- NCI: follow-up medical care — Written treatment summary and follow-up planning.
- NCI: nutrition and cancer claims — Nutrition versus unproven cancer treatment.
- NCI: food and supplement interactions — Medicine-specific interaction review only.
- NCI budget and appropriations, May 2026 — Institutional appropriation route only.
- NCI Gift Fund and contribution routes, August 2025 — Separate gift route and office identity; no clinical evidence.
- NCI PDQ editorial boards, November 2022 — Board independence, honoraria and conflict-disclosure scope.
- NHS national content policy, October 2022 — Website funding and editorial safeguards only.
- Greenspring Personal Oncology: Seifter service identity — Named reviewer’s private-provider relationship only.
- WHO lymphoid classification, 2022 — Selected classical pathology and NLPHL naming only.
- WHO classification authorship correction, 2023 — Corrected author/institution record only.
- Campo et al.: International Consensus Classification, 2022 — Selected disease-family and naming distinctions only.
- Swerdlow et al.: cited 2016 financial chain — Historical funding trace only; no clinical findings.
- ICC erratum record, 2023 — Correction awareness; no figure-derived clinical claim.
- DEAL: publication-payment mechanism — Open-access payment route and operator identity only.
- ELN 2025: separately dated Hochhaus interests — WHO coauthor relationship only; no CML clinical claims.
Educational research reviewed 4 October 2026. Diagnosis and treatment require a qualified clinician; this article does not provide an individual prescription or replace urgent assessment.
Have a question — or want us to cover something?
Ask about anything on this page, or request the next deep dive: an ingredient, a supplement, or a health concern. We use published research, evidence syntheses, and regulatory guidance, with clear source links.
One daily research roundup
Get the topics, key findings and links from our new articles in one email. At most one digest a day, only when there is something new.
