Upper GI endoscopy: gastroscopy, biopsies, preparation and results

Upper GI endoscopy uses a flexible camera tube to examine the oesophagus, stomach and first part of the small intestine. It is also called gastroscopy or esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD/OGD). It can identify visible abnormalities, take biopsies or perform selected treatment. Confidence is high in this attributed procedural description; the reason for the test, preparation and interpretation need an individual clinical plan.

Key takeaways
  • Gastroscopy examines the upper digestive lining; it is different from colonoscopy and duct-access ERCP.
  • The visual report and a laboratory biopsy result answer different questions and may arrive separately.
  • The team should explain whether the appointment is diagnostic, therapeutic or both.
  • Discuss blood-thinning, diabetes, weight-loss and sedating medicines, implanted devices and allergies before the test.
  • Vomiting blood, severe or worsening chest/abdominal pain, breathing difficulty or persistent vomiting after the procedure needs emergency assessment.

Evidence summary

Clinical guidance, human outcome research and funding independence answer different questions. The guidance below explains care; it does not independently reproduce the trials behind a medicine or supplement.

Claim / interventionEvidence reviewedFunding / conflictsInterpretation / limits
ExaminationAttributed clinical originalsGSTT mixed provider/NHS public routes; NIDDK public/gifts plus Shaheen commercial ties; allocations unclosed.Examination/sampling/therapy roles differ; no complete diagnostic guarantee.
ResultsProvider aftercare contextProvider institutional income separate; full author and original-study finance unclosed.Visual and laboratory results separate; no deadline or symptom attribution rule.
PreparationCurrent provider contextSame provider financial routes; exact page and contributor allocation unclosed.Individual medicine/device/sedation planning; no personal fast, pause or recovery timetable.
SafetyCurrent national/provider warningsNational website funding differs from provider income; underlying study chains unclosed.Urgent/emergency assessment; no rarity reassurance or home diagnosis.

What upper GI endoscopy examines

The camera shows the lining of the upper digestive tract. EGD is the abbreviation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy; OGD uses the British spelling of oesophagus. The tube can carry instruments for sampling or selected treatment, rather than merely taking pictures. Selected definition.

The provider overview describes investigating problems such as swallowing difficulty, persistent upper abdominal symptoms, vomiting, bleeding concerns or unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia. A referral symptom is not itself a diagnosis. Selected reasons for gastroscopy.

Ask which question the referral is intended to answer. Is the concern a visible lesion, a possible tissue abnormality or treatment of a known finding? Bring relevant earlier reports so the team can explain whether this is a first investigation or a comparison with a previous examination. The procedure’s name alone does not communicate the intended scope.

Oral and transnasal approaches, biopsies and treatment

An upper endoscope may pass through the mouth or, for a suitable transnasal examination, through the nose. The available approach and comfort measures depend on the unit and purpose. One provider’s preferred route is not a universal rule. Route context.

NIDDK describes tissue sampling and selected actions such as controlling bleeding or widening a narrowed oesophagus. These interventions have a different goal from an examination alone. Ask what treatment may be performed and what would require a separate consent discussion or appointment. Selected intervention context.

A biopsy means a small sample is sent for laboratory examination. It does not mean cancer has been found, and its purpose may relate to inflammation or another diagnostic question. Ask where samples are planned and how each result will be interpreted. Do not assume every gastroscopy uses the same sampling protocol.

Visual findings, pathology and the next decision

The unit may provide an initial procedure report before laboratory analysis is complete. The provider’s aftercare information describes communicating findings and arranging later biopsy results. Sedation may make the initial explanation harder to remember, so request written information. Results and communication.

Ask separately what the endoscopist saw, what was sampled and what is still pending. An image of the lining and microscopic analysis are different observations. If the report says the examination was incomplete or difficult, ask how that affects the answer to the original question.

A report should lead to a plan: who explains the final conclusion, whether further investigation is needed and who manages ongoing symptoms. If the appearance is described as normal, ask which concerns have been addressed and which remain. An online summary cannot decide whether a particular finding explains a person’s symptoms.

Food, supplements and unsupported replacement claims

No financially screened supplement or restrictive diet is established here as a substitute for an indicated endoscopy or biopsy. “Gut healing,” “detox” or “anti-inflammatory” marketing does not establish that a product can identify the cause of bleeding or swallowing difficulty.

NCCIH’s selected safety information warns that supplements may interact with medicines and affect anaesthesia or bleeding. Give the unit ingredients and the amounts actually used, including powders, extracts, teas and nonprescription products. Natural origin does not establish procedural safety. Selected supplement safety.

Food and fluid preparation should come from the endoscopy team. If swallowing is difficult, intake is falling or a self-imposed diet is becoming restrictive, explain that problem to the referring clinician. Request support for the actual nutritional concern rather than postponing investigation while testing a long list of products.

What the examination can and cannot accomplish

The national NHS describes gastroscopy as a test that can investigate symptoms and perform selected treatment, including controlling bleeding, widening a narrowing or removing some growths. The indication and action need to be clear in the consent discussion. Selected diagnostic and therapeutic roles.

Ask how the possible findings would change care. Does the team expect a visual answer, laboratory confirmation or both? If an abnormality is found, ask whether it is the suspected explanation for the symptoms or an additional finding requiring its own assessment.

This guide does not supply a sensitivity estimate, promise that one examination excludes every disease, or independently rank scope systems and hospitals. It also does not turn a device manufacturer’s diagnostic or comfort claim into an independent verdict. The clinically useful question is whether the planned examination can answer the specific concern with acceptable risk.

Risks and symptoms requiring urgent help

NIDDK describes risks involving sedation, bleeding or a tear in the digestive tract. Risk differs when the procedure includes treatment. Ask the unit which potential complications apply to the planned examination and which warning signs require immediate assessment. Selected risk context.

The national NHS advises emergency assessment for vomiting blood, vomiting that does not stop, severe or worsening abdominal or chest pain, or breathing difficulty after gastroscopy. Use the local emergency service when needed and do not drive yourself. Emergency signs.

Fever or shivering and dark, tar-like stool also need prompt contact with the hospital or urgent medical service. Tell the assessing clinician that an upper endoscopy was performed, including any treatment mentioned in the discharge report. Do not wait for biopsy results when new concerning symptoms arise. Selected aftercare warnings.

Medicines, implanted devices and interaction review

The current provider preparation page asks about anticoagulants/antiplatelets, diabetes treatment, weight-loss medicines, sedatives and chronic pain treatments. It also asks about pacemakers or ICDs, important illnesses and allergies. These details can affect the plan; the label “routine gastroscopy” does not remove the need for assessment. Selected pre-assessment context.

Provide the exact medicine list actually used, including injections and nonprescription products. Ask who will issue the final instructions for any adjustment and how restarting treatment will be handled. Do not copy another hospital’s pause dates or alter medicines because a generic internet guide lists a possible interaction.

For an implanted cardiac device, bring its information and the follow-up service details. If the team needs a device review, ask how it will be coordinated with the proposed endoscopic intervention. Explain past anaesthetic or sedative reactions specifically, rather than only saying a previous procedure went badly.

Who needs additional communication or safety planning

Tell the unit about major health changes, pregnancy or possible pregnancy and relevant medical conditions. The provider specifically requests information about diabetes, haemophilia and Addison’s disease. Ask how the intended procedure and sedation affect the individual plan. Selected health assessment.

If anxiety, previous distress, mobility problems or communication needs could make the examination difficult, raise them before the appointment. Ask for language support and an explanation of how you can signal discomfort or request a pause. It is reasonable to ask who will help during the examination and how the consent discussion will be conducted.

If sedation is planned, arrange collection and support as directed by the unit. If that is difficult, contact it beforehand to discuss the problem. The discharge arrangement should be settled before sedation; this article gives no promise that an unsedated approach is suitable for every person or treatment.

Preparation, comfort measures and returning home

The team gives instructions for food, drink and medicines. During the examination it may use local anaesthetic or sedation, and the patient can discuss how to signal difficulty. The preparation and support plan should match the actual route and intended action. Selected procedure and consent context.

Afterwards, follow the written instructions for eating and drinking, medicine use and activity. Sedation-related restrictions can apply to driving, machinery and decisions. Obtain the unit’s directions rather than using a fixed recovery period from another guide. Discharge context.

Before leaving, check the contact number for concerns, the initial findings, what was done and which results remain outstanding. If a new treatment is proposed, ask which finding justifies it and who will review it. If instructions from different teams conflict, ask them to reconcile the plan rather than choosing a medicine pause or diet rule yourself.

Experimental imaging and laboratory claims

A laboratory marker or artificial-intelligence image classifier may be studied for a specific upper digestive condition. Its performance in one setting does not establish that it replaces gastroscopy or pathology for all indications. The relevant human comparison must address missed disease, the reference standard, clinical consequences and harms.

No animal or in-vitro finding is used here to recommend a supplement that replaces investigation or a device that guarantees a diagnosis. If research participation is offered, ask which findings will guide your treatment, which remain experimental, and how the sponsor and investigators are connected to the test.

Funding and source roles

Follow the money

Who paid for the evidence?

Follow named sources to the funding and relationships disclosed in this article. Numbered article disclosures preserve notes where a source is not identified. A public or university name alone does not establish independence.

Public / academicCommercial support or tiesUnknown / not disclosed
Disclosed funding & relationshipsSeparate NCCIH historical public appropriations and Gift Fund authority. Current donor/page allocations and complete contributor/source-study chains unclosed.
Use & limitsC provisional — actual selected safety original read; public scientific accountability favors accuracy, while dated summaries and unclosed author/study finance limit use. No independent efficacy conclusion.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsInstitutional routes in separate congressional justification and gift authority. Page allocation and complete original-study chains unclosed. Original credits Nicholas J. Shaheen, UNC; see separate2022 declaration. The period and payments for the2023 page are unclosed.
Use & limitsC provisional — actual2023 clinical context; expertise favors accuracy, while relevant research/consulting incentives and incomplete page/trial finance remain.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOriginal2022 paper reports no article financial support, but Shaheen research from Medtronic, Steris, Pentax and diagnostic companies, and consulting including Phathom and device/diagnostic businesses. This does not prove payment for NIDDK’s2023 page. Full amounts, institutional revenue and supporting trials unclosed.
Use & limitsC provisional — original named relationships read; financial context only. Expert reputation favors accuracy, while research/consulting incentives and incomplete allocations remain.
View 11 more funding disclosures
Disclosed funding & relationshipsSeparate provider finance: own current accounts. Specific leaflet budget, author payments and original studies unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional — actual dated patient body read; clinical accountability favors accuracy, while local service assumptions and unclosed author/trial finance remain.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsSeparate provider finance: own current accounts. Specific leaflet budget, author payments and original studies unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional — actual dated patient body read; clinical accountability favors accuracy, while local service assumptions and unclosed author/trial finance remain.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsSeparate provider finance: own current accounts. Specific leaflet budget, author payments and original studies unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional — actual dated patient body read; clinical accountability favors accuracy, while local service assumptions and unclosed author/trial finance remain.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsSee separate national accounts and website funding policy. Individual page allocation, external expert and original-study interests unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional — actual dated national patient body read; public care accountability and clinical checking favor accuracy, while simplification and full contributor/trial finance remain gaps.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOwn 2025–2026 audited notes3–4: NHS/public commissioner and private-patient income; R&D, education, services and charitable/grant contributions. Directors’ report names Johnson & Johnson Managed Services, Diaverum and Active Care Group partnerships, plus venture/commercial routes. These do not establish payment for a particular leaflet. Full donor, author and page/trial allocations unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOwn 2025–2026 audited accounts identify DHSC grant-in-aid as principal finance, with services, research/training and other consolidated income. Parent and consolidated accounts differ. Exact website-page allocation unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOwn 2022 policy says DHSC funds the national website, which rejects advertising/corporate sponsorship and requires staff/outside-agent interest reporting. This does not certify each supporting study or hospital’s finances.
Use & limitsB provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOwn FY2027 congressional justification distinguishes FY2026 enacted congressional funding from a future budget request, and separate mandatory type1-diabetes funding. It is not an FY2026 operating plan. Page allocation and complete gift receipts unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOwn May2024 FAQ describes congressional appropriations plus permitted conditional/unconditional gifts and bequests, with acceptance safeguards; Bethesda and Phoenix locations. No complete current donor ledger or page allocation verified.
Use & limitsB provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOwn appropriation history documents congressional finance through FY2024; not a current enacted2026 amount or page budget.
Use & limitsB provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
Disclosed funding & relationshipsOwn authority permits conditional and unconditional gifts/bequests in a fund separate from appropriation; operating costs from appropriation. Complete current donor ledger and clinical-page allocation unclosed.
Use & limitsB provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.

This graphic reorganizes the article's disclosures; it is not a new financial audit or independence classification. Highlighted notes show different funding relationships where available. Review funding is separate from underlying trial funding. Disclosure is not proof of falsehood, and no declared conflict is not proof of complete independence.

Current national and provider patient information supplies attributed procedural context. Their financial routes are traced separately; a hospital’s private, research and charitable income cannot be replaced by the national website’s funding policy. Full procedure-page and source-study allocations remain unclosed.

NIDDK’s2023 page credits Shaheen. The actual2022 ACG original identifies relevant research and consulting relationships, while reporting no support for that article. This is financial context rather than proof of payment for the NIDDK page or independent endorsement of its supporting trials.

SourceFunding / backersCountry / jurisdictionIndependenceCredibility / incentives / gaps
Guy’s and St Thomas’ gastroscopy overview, April2026Separate provider finance: own current accounts. Specific leaflet budget, author payments and original studies unclosed.United Kingdom; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.Tier 2 provider clinical education, provisional.B provisional — actual dated patient body read; clinical accountability favors accuracy, while local service assumptions and unclosed author/trial finance remain.
Guy’s and St Thomas’ gastroscopy preparation and procedure, April2026Separate provider finance: own current accounts. Specific leaflet budget, author payments and original studies unclosed.United Kingdom; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.Tier 2 provider clinical education, provisional.B provisional — actual dated patient body read; clinical accountability favors accuracy, while local service assumptions and unclosed author/trial finance remain.
Guy’s and St Thomas’ gastroscopy aftercare, April2026Separate provider finance: own current accounts. Specific leaflet budget, author payments and original studies unclosed.United Kingdom; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.Tier 2 provider clinical education, provisional.B provisional — actual dated patient body read; clinical accountability favors accuracy, while local service assumptions and unclosed author/trial finance remain.
National NHS gastroscopy information, August13,2026See separate national accounts and website funding policy. Individual page allocation, external expert and original-study interests unclosed.United Kingdom; national NHS England information, registered contact Leeds; individual provider finances separate.Tier 1 public institutional education, provisional.B provisional — actual dated national patient body read; public care accountability and clinical checking favor accuracy, while simplification and full contributor/trial finance remain gaps.
NIDDK upper GI endoscopy, October2023; Shaheen creditedInstitutional routes in separate congressional justification and gift authority. Page allocation and complete original-study chains unclosed. Original credits Nicholas J. Shaheen, UNC; see separate2022 declaration. The period and payments for the2023 page are unclosed.United States; NIDDK/NIH/HHS institutional contact Bethesda, Maryland; credited expert locations separately identified.Tier 3 credited expert with relevant disclosed commercial relationships.C provisional — actual2023 clinical context; expertise favors accuracy, while relevant research/consulting incentives and incomplete page/trial finance remain.
NCCIH supplement safety, January2019; selected safety context onlySeparate NCCIH historical public appropriations and Gift Fund authority. Current donor/page allocations and complete contributor/source-study chains unclosed.United States; NIH/HHS NCCIH, actual contact Bethesda, Maryland.Tier 1 public institutional safety education, provisional.C provisional — actual selected safety original read; public scientific accountability favors accuracy, while dated summaries and unclosed author/study finance limit use. No independent efficacy conclusion.
Guy’s and St Thomas’ own 2025–2026 audited accountsOwn 2025–2026 audited notes3–4: NHS/public commissioner and private-patient income; R&D, education, services and charitable/grant contributions. Directors’ report names Johnson & Johnson Managed Services, Diaverum and Active Care Group partnerships, plus venture/commercial routes. These do not establish payment for a particular leaflet. Full donor, author and page/trial allocations unclosed.United Kingdom; Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England.Tier 3 institutional financial/contact self-disclosure.B provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
NHS England own 2025–2026 audited accountsOwn 2025–2026 audited accounts identify DHSC grant-in-aid as principal finance, with services, research/training and other consolidated income. Parent and consolidated accounts differ. Exact website-page allocation unclosed.United Kingdom; national NHS England information, registered contact Leeds; individual provider finances separate.Tier 3 institutional financial/contact self-disclosure.B provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
National NHS website content and funding policy, 2022Own 2022 policy says DHSC funds the national website, which rejects advertising/corporate sponsorship and requires staff/outside-agent interest reporting. This does not certify each supporting study or hospital’s finances.United Kingdom; national NHS England information, registered contact Leeds; individual provider finances separate.Tier 3 institutional financial/contact self-disclosure.B provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
NIDDK own FY2027 congressional justification; FY2026 enacted separately identifiedOwn FY2027 congressional justification distinguishes FY2026 enacted congressional funding from a future budget request, and separate mandatory type1-diabetes funding. It is not an FY2026 operating plan. Page allocation and complete gift receipts unclosed.United States; NIDDK/NIH/HHS institutional contact Bethesda, Maryland; credited expert locations separately identified.Tier 3 institutional financial/contact self-disclosure.B provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
NIDDK original institutional FAQ, reviewed May2024Own May2024 FAQ describes congressional appropriations plus permitted conditional/unconditional gifts and bequests, with acceptance safeguards; Bethesda and Phoenix locations. No complete current donor ledger or page allocation verified.United States; NIDDK/NIH/HHS institutional contact Bethesda, Maryland; credited expert locations separately identified.Tier 3 institutional financial/contact self-disclosure.B provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
Original ACG Barrett guideline2022 author declarations; financial context onlyOriginal2022 paper reports no article financial support, but Shaheen research from Medtronic, Steris, Pentax and diagnostic companies, and consulting including Phathom and device/diagnostic businesses. This does not prove payment for NIDDK’s2023 page. Full amounts, institutional revenue and supporting trials unclosed.United States; Shaheen at UNC, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; each named backer’s ownership/jurisdiction unclosed.Tier 3 declared expert commercial relationships.C provisional — original named relationships read; financial context only. Expert reputation favors accuracy, while research/consulting incentives and incomplete allocations remain.
NCCIH actual appropriation history, through FY2024Own appropriation history documents congressional finance through FY2024; not a current enacted2026 amount or page budget.United States; NIH/HHS NCCIH, actual contact Bethesda, Maryland.Tier 3 institutional financial/contact self-disclosure.B provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.
NCCIH separate conditional/unconditional Gift Fund authorityOwn authority permits conditional and unconditional gifts/bequests in a fund separate from appropriation; operating costs from appropriation. Complete current donor ledger and clinical-page allocation unclosed.United States; NIH/HHS NCCIH, actual contact Bethesda, Maryland.Tier 3 institutional financial/contact self-disclosure.B provisional for explicitly dated institutional provenance. Statutory/public scrutiny favors accuracy; institutional reporting incentives and allocation gaps remain. Financial context only.

Frequently asked questions

Are EGD, OGD and gastroscopy related terms? They refer to upper digestive endoscopy; confirm the intended route and actions for your appointment. Procedure terminology.

Does taking a biopsy mean cancer was found? No. Ask which laboratory question the sample is intended to answer. Sampling context.

Will every result be available before I leave? An initial report and later laboratory results may be separate. Confirm how each will be communicated. Results plan.

Can it also provide treatment? Selected interventions are possible; ask what is included in your consent and what needs another appointment. Treatment role.

Should I stop my medicines before the test? Obtain the unit’s instructions for the actual medicines and procedure; this guide gives no pause or dose rule. Medicine planning.

Sources and funding notes

Actual selected April2026 provider three bodies, August13,2026 national NHS gastroscopy and October2023 NIDDK upper-GI original read. Original credits Shaheen; actual2022 ACG full29p author declaration used only for financial context, not a recommendation or page-payment inference. Separate current provider/national accounts and public-policy/NIDDK enacted-request/gift originals checked. Dated NCCIH safety and historical appropriation/Gift Fund read. Local route defaults, fixed fasting/pause/recovery rules, pain or risk reassurance and result deadlines excluded.

  1. Guy’s and St Thomas’ gastroscopy overview, April2026 — Selected routes/reasons; local-default and coeliac wording excluded
  2. Guy’s and St Thomas’ gastroscopy preparation and procedure, April2026 — Selected current assessment/procedure; no fixed pause/fasting rules
  3. Guy’s and St Thomas’ gastroscopy aftercare, April2026 — Selected results/discharge/warnings; no timing guarantee
  4. National NHS gastroscopy information, August13,2026 — ActualAugust2026 diagnostic/treatment and emergency context
  5. NIDDK upper GI endoscopy, October2023; Shaheen credited — SelectedOctober2023 context with credited expert commercial interests
  6. NCCIH supplement safety, January2019; selected safety context only — Selected dated safety only
  7. Guy’s and St Thomas’ own 2025–2026 audited accounts — Separate actual current provider finance
  8. NHS England own 2025–2026 audited accounts — Separate actual national finance
  9. National NHS website content and funding policy, 2022 — Separate website policy, not provider/trial clearance
  10. NIDDK own FY2027 congressional justification; FY2026 enacted separately identified — Separate enacted versus requested funding
  11. NIDDK original institutional FAQ, reviewed May2024 — Separate permitted gifts; full receipts unclosed
  12. Original ACG Barrett guideline2022 author declarations; financial context only — Actual2022 named expert relationships; no clinical guideline recommendations transferred
  13. NCCIH actual appropriation history, through FY2024 — Historical appropriation route only
  14. NCCIH separate conditional/unconditional Gift Fund authority — Separate permitted Gift Fund

Educational information reviewed 4 October 2026. This guide supports an informed clinical discussion; it does not diagnose an individual or provide a personal treatment regimen.

Have a question — or want us to cover something?

Ask about anything on this page, or request the next deep dive: an ingredient, a supplement, or a health concern. We use published research, evidence syntheses, and regulatory guidance, with clear source links.

We store your topic, message, optional email, and this page so we can manage and reply to the request. Do not include diagnoses, medications, or other sensitive medical information. See our Privacy Policy.