The Human-Trial Evidence Index: 25 Supplement Ingredients Ranked by Human-Trial Evidence

Human-Trial Evidence Index — v1

Pure City Research · purecityresearch.org
Version: v1 (first 25 ingredients — expanding to 50)
Last reviewed: 2026-09-04
License: CC BY 4.0 (dataset + article)
Authorship: Pure City Research (organization-only; no personal bylines)

---

Editorial Introduction

Pure City Research is editorially independent. We are building a reader-supported funding model — no advertising, no manufacturer sponsorship. This index is the first public artifact of that promise: a single, openly licensed table ranking 25 widely used dietary-supplement ingredients by the strength of their human clinical-trial evidence — not by marketing, popularity, or mechanistic plausibility. Every row is tied to a public source (PubMed, Cochrane, or NIH Office of Dietary Supplements). Where the human evidence is thin, the table says so plainly. We grade conservatively: a supplement does not earn "Strong" by tradition or testimonials, only by replicated, human-trial proof. This is v1 — 25 ingredients drawn from topics the site already covers deeply, with new rows added as the evidence is reviewed. The CSV mirror is intended for Zenodo DOI assignment and a GitHub mirror so journalists, clinicians, and AI engines can cite and verify every cell.

---

Methodology

Scope. v1 covers 25 ingredients selected from topics purecityresearch.org already covers (magnesium, CoQ10, nattokinase, melatonin, omega-3, berberine, ashwagandha, L-theanine, creatine, vitamin D, collagen, probiotics, garlic, psyllium, zinc-L-carnosine, L-glutamine, rhodiola, St John's wort, saffron, L-tyrosine, tongkat ali, myo-inositol, glutathione, astaxanthin, shilajit). v1 will expand toward 50.

Evidence standard. Human evidence only: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, plus Cochrane reviews, NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) fact sheets, NCCIH, FDA/DailyMed, and NCBI Bookshelf/StatPearls for safety and regulatory context. Mechanistic or in-vitro data is never presented as clinical proof — consistent with the site's existing nattokinase and magnesium articles.

Grading rubric (matches the site's published Strong/Moderate/Weak/Insufficient vocabulary).
- Strong — multiple high-quality meta-analyses of RCTs with consistent, clinically meaningful effects; large, replicated participant pools; independent (non-industry) replication; recognized by guideline bodies or carrying an authorized health claim.
- Moderate — meta-analyses or several RCTs showing a real but modest effect, or a strong effect confined to a narrow population; some heterogeneity or funding concerns; not yet sufficient for "Strong."
- Weak — small, short, few, or single-arm trials; high risk of bias; inconsistent or industry-confounded results; positive signals that disappear under independent scrutiny.
- Insufficient — no robust human outcome trials; only biomarker or pilot data; poor bioavailability undermines the claimed route; or claims rest entirely on in-vitro/mechanistic evidence.

How counts were derived. Human RCT counts and pooled participant figures are taken from the largest accessible named meta-analysis or systematic review per ingredient, supplemented by PubMed/academic search verification (pplx_sdk). Where a precise pooled N could not be independently verified, the cell is marked "needs verification" rather than estimated.

Funding flag. Industry-funded evidence is treated as a downgrade signal, exactly as the site's magnesium article downgrades the industry-funded magnesium-L-threonate study. Several rows (collagen, rhodiola, tongkat ali, shilajit, ashwagandha) note industry affiliation explicitly.

Limitations. (1) Counts reflect trials indexed in PubMed/Cochrane under common search terms and may omit regional or non-English-language trials. (2) "Pooled participants" is taken from a single named meta-analysis per row and is not a total across all trials ever published. (3) Grades are a structured editorial judgment, not a formal GRADE or Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment — they are reproducible but not equivalent to one. (4) This is v1; rows will be revised as new trials publish. (5) The index is educational, not treatment guidance; users should consult clinicians.

---

The Evidence Index (v1, 25 ingredients)

#IngredientPrimary claimed useHuman RCTs (found)Pooled participants (key meta-analysis)Effect directionEvidence gradeGrade justification (one line)Key source citationTypical effective dose (trials)Headline safety note
1MagnesiumBlood pressure / migraine prevention adjunct342,028 (34-RCT BP meta-analysis)Positive (modest)ModerateConsistent modest BP reduction + moderate migraine support; weak for sleep/crampsKass et al., Eur J Clin Nutr 2012; NIH ODS Magnesium300–600 mg elemental/day (migraine); >400 mg (BP)Supplemental UL 350 mg/day; hypermagnesemia risk in renal impairment
2CoQ10 (ubiquinone/ubiquinol)Statin muscle pain / heart-failure adjunct12575 (JAHA 12-RCT statin-myalgia meta)PositiveModerateConsistent statin-myalgia effect + Q-SYMBIO HF adjunct; null for general energy/anti-agingJAHA meta-analysis (12 RCTs); Mortensen Q-SYMBIO, JACC 2014100–200 mg/day (myalgia/migraine); 300 mg/day (HF)May lower warfarin INR; fat-soluble, take with food
3NattokinaseBlood pressure / cardiovascular markers6546 (2023 6-RCT meta-analysis)Positive (modest BP)WeakModest BP effect in a small meta-analysis; clot-dissolution/Long-COVID claims have zero human RCT support (in-vitro only)2023 systematic review & meta-analysis, PMID 390767152,000 FU/day (~100 mg)Bleeding risk; avoid with anticoagulants/antiplatelets; stop pre-surgery
4MelatoninCircadian timing / jet lag / DSWPDMany (multiple)needs verification (large across Cochrane + sleep-latency meta-analyses)Mixed (positive circadian; modest insomnia)ModerateRobust for jet lag/circadian phase (Cochrane); only ~7–10 min sleep-onset latency gain in chronic insomniaCochrane review (jet lag); AASM clinical guideline0.3–1 mg (physiological); 30–60 min before bedNext-day grogginess at high doses; commercial potency variability (JAMA gummy study 74–347% of label)
5Omega-3 (fish oil, EPA/DHA)Cardiovascular risk / triglyceride lowering86+135,291 (14-RCT CHD meta-analysis, Gong 2022)MixedModerateLarge trial base; modest MACE reduction in some meta-analyses, null in others; benefit concentrated in high-risk/high-dose EPA (REDUCE-IT)Cochrane (Abdelhamid 2020); AHA Advisory 2017; Gong et al. 20221 g/day EPA+DHA (general); 4 g/day icosapent ethyl (high-risk Rx)Bleeding risk at high doses; atrial-fibrillation signal at high doses; fish allergy
6BerberineBlood glucose / HbA1c support (T2D adjunct)37+3,048 (Xie 2022, 37-RCT meta-analysis)PositiveModerateConsistent HbA1c (~−0.6–0.7%) and lipid improvements; "Nature's Ozempic" claim falseXie et al. 2022, Front Pharmacol; NIH ODS900–1,500 mg/day divided, with mealsPotent CYP3A4 inhibitor (drug interactions); EFSA genotoxicity concerns; avoid in pregnancy
7AshwagandhaStress / cortisol reduction15needs verification (2025 15-trial meta-analysis)Positive (modest)ModerateModest cortisol/stress/sleep gains in meta-analyses; trials small/short; testosterone/athletic claims weak2025 meta-analysis of 15 RCTs; NIH LiverTox300–600 mg/day standardized root extract (KSM-66/Sensoril)LiverTox Likelihood B (drug-induced liver injury); avoid in pregnancy, autoimmune/thyroid disease
8L-TheanineCalm focus / caffeine synergyMultiple (small)needs verification (small acute trials)MixedWeakReliable caffeine-synergy cognitive benefit; null for clinical GAD (8-wk RCT, p=0.73)Randomized crossover EEG trials; GAD RCT100–200 mg (2:1 ratio with caffeine)GRAS; theoretical additive effects with sedatives/antihypertensives
9Creatine monohydrateMuscle strength / lean mass (ergogenic)23large across 2 meta-analyses (2024: 23 RCTs; 2025: 20 studies, n=1,093)PositiveStrongMost-researched ergogenic; large meta-analyses + ISSN position stand; excellent safety profile2024 meta-analysis of 23 RCTs (+4.43/+11.35 kg strength); ISSN position stand3–5 g/day (or 20 g/day load ×5–7d)Benign water retention; no kidney damage in healthy; DHT/hair-loss myth unreplicated
10Vitamin DBone health / deficiency correctionMany (large)>25,000 (VITAL trial)MixedModerateDefinitive for deficiency/osteomalacia; VITAL/D2d null for broad cancer/CVD/diabetes prevention in replete adultsVITAL (NEJM 2019); D2d; Cochrane600–800 IU/day (RDA); 2,000 IU (VITAL)UL 4,000 IU/day; hypervitaminosis/hypercalcemia at very high chronic doses
11Collagen peptidesSkin aging / joint support23needs verification (2025 AJM 23-RCT meta-analysis)MixedWeakPositive skin effects disappear when industry-funded studies excluded; tendon biomarker signal only2025 meta-analysis of 23 RCTs, Am J Med2.5–10 g/day (cosmetic); 15 g gelatin+vit C pre-exercise (tendon)Generally safe; heavy-metal contamination risk (animal-derived) — third-party testing advised
12Probiotics (strain-specific)Antibiotic-associated diarrhea preventionMany (Cochrane/meta)large across strain-specific meta-analyses (AAD RR ~0.63)Positive (strain-specific)ModerateRobust for specific strains (S. boulardii, L. rhamnosus GG) for AAD; broad immune/weight claims unprovenCochrane/meta-analysis AAD (RR ~0.63); ESPGHAN guidelines5–20 billion CFU/day of a validated strainGenerally safe; serious infection risk in immunocompromised/critically ill/premature infants
13Garlic (Aged Garlic Extract)Blood pressure reductionMany (meta-analyses)needs verification (RCT meta-analyses)Positive (modest, hypertensives)ModerateConsistent modest BP reduction (−3.7 to −4.4 mmHg systolic) in hypertensives; null in normotensivesMeta-analyses of RCTs; Cochrane600–1,200 mg/day Aged Garlic ExtractAntiplatelet/bleeding risk; stop 7–10 days pre-surgery; GI upset, odor
14Psyllium huskLDL cholesterol / constipation>40large (>40-RCT meta-analysis)PositiveStrongRobust meta-analyses + FDA-authorized health claim for LDL reduction; effective bulk-forming laxativeMeta-analysis of >40 RCTs; FDA 21 CFR 101.81 health claim; Cochrane7–10 g/day soluble fiber (LDL); 5–15 g/day (constipation)Esophageal/bowel obstruction if taken without water; separate from medications 2–4 h
15Zinc-L-carnosine (polaprezinc)Gastric mucosal healingModerate (Japanese RCTs)needs verificationPositive (mucosal)ModerateApproved anti-ulcer drug in Japan with RCT support for mucosal healing & H. pylori-eradication adjunct; "leaky gut" claims weak/industry-affiliatedJapanese clinical approval data; RCTs; Cochrane150 mg/day complex (34 mg elemental Zn), dividedCopper depletion with long-term use near 40 mg Zn UL
16L-GlutaminePost-infectious IBS-D / intestinal permeabilityModerate106 (Zhou et al. RCT)Positive (narrow)ModerateStrong RCT for post-infectious IBS-D (15 g/day); FDA-approved (Endari) for sickle cell; athletic & general "leaky gut" claims unsupportedZhou et al. RCT (106 adults); FDA Endari approval15 g/day (5 g ×3) for IBS-DContraindicated in severe hepatic impairment/cirrhosis (hyperammonemia) & advanced CKD
17Rhodiola roseaFatigue / stress ("adaptogen")11needs verification (11-trial systematic review)MixedWeakIndependent reviews cite high bias, small samples, inconsistent outcomes; inferior to sertraline; industry-confoundedUniversity of Alberta systematic review of 11 RCTs; EMA herbal monograph200–600 mg/day standardized extract (3% rosavins/1% salidroside)Generally well-tolerated; theoretical serotonergic interactions with SSRIs/SNRIs
18St John's wortMild-to-moderate depression295,489 (Cochrane 29-trial review)PositiveModerateCochrane: superior to placebo, comparable to SSRIs for mild-mod depression; but potent CYP3A4/P-gp inducer with dangerous interactionsCochrane systematic review of 29 trials (n=5,489); Apaydin et al. meta900 mg/day standardized extract (0.3% hypericin)Dangerous interactions — oral contraceptives, warfarin, immunosuppressants, antiretrovirals; serotonin syndrome with SSRIs
19Saffron (Crocus sativus)Depressive/anxious mood (self-report)341,769 (2026 GRADE 34-RCT meta-analysis)MixedModerate34-RCT meta shows self-report improvement but null on clinician-rated scales; high heterogeneity; mostly Iran2026 GRADE meta-analysis of 34 RCTs (n=1,769)30 mg/day standardized stigma extract (15 mg ×2)Contraindicated in pregnancy (uterine stimulation); theoretical antiplatelet/hypotensive additive effects
20L-TyrosineAcute-stress cognitive preservationMultiple (small military/lab)needs verification (small crossover trials)MixedWeakPreserves cognition under acute stress (cold/sleep deprivation/multitasking); null for baseline cognition/depression/ADHDUSARIEM/Dutch Navy RCTs; neurochemical reviews100–150 mg/kg (~7–10 g) single dose pre-stressContraindicated with MAOIs (hypertensive crisis); competes with levodopa; caution in hyperthyroidism
21Tongkat ali (Eurycoma longifolia)Testosterone support (hypogonadal men)Small numberneeds verification (small trials)MixedWeakModest testosterone rise in hypogonadal/older men via SHBG displacement; small trials; eugonadal/athletic claims unprovenPlacebo-controlled RCTs; FDA/EFSA reviews100–200 mg/day standardized hot-water extractHepatotoxicity case reports; heavy-metal (lead/mercury) & sildenafil adulteration risk
22Myo-inositolPCOS metabolic/hormonal supportMany (2023 PCOS Guideline meta)large across meta-analyses (4,000 mg/day trials)Positive (metabolic)Moderate2023 International PCOS Guideline: improves insulin sensitivity/menstrual cyclicity; live-birth evidence low-certainty; 40:1 ratio contested2023 International PCOS Guideline meta-analyses; Cochrane4,000 mg/day (2,000 mg ×2) + folic acidExcellent tolerability; mild GI effects at >12 g/day
23Glutathione (oral)Antioxidant support / "detox" / skinSmall numbersmall (no robust outcome meta-analysis)MixedInsufficientOral bioavailability <1%; small RCTs show biomarker elevation only with novel delivery (liposomal/orobuccal); no large outcome trialsAllen & Bradley 2011 RCT; Sinha et al. 2018 liposomal RCT; NIH ODS500–1,000 mg/day (liposomal/orobuccal better absorbed)Generally well-tolerated; "skin-whitening" high-dose use unproven; avoid inhaled forms
24AstaxanthinSkin moisture / elasticity11needs verification (11-study meta; 7-RCT lipid meta n=280)MixedWeakModerate skin moisture/elasticity signal (SMD 0.53/0.77) but no wrinkle reduction; "internal sunscreen" & lipid/BP claims null2021 systematic review/meta of 11 studies; 7-RCT lipids meta (n=280)4–12 mg/dayExcellent safety profile; benign orange-tinted stools at high doses; take with fat
25ShilajitTestosterone / vitality (older men)1 (small)~60–75 (single 90-day RCT)MixedInsufficientSingle small manufacturer-affiliated RCT; energy/performance claims rest on uncontrolled pilot; raw resin heavy-metal risk90-day RCT (healthy men 45–55); regulatory advisories250–500 mg/day purified extract (PrimaVie)Raw resin heavy-metal (lead/arsenic/mercury) risk; avoid in hemochromatosis/gout/hypotension

Reading the table. "Human RCTs (found)" and "Pooled participants" are drawn from the largest accessible named meta-analysis per ingredient and are not exhaustive totals. "Effect direction" summarizes the overall human-trial signal for the primary claimed use: Positive = consistent benefit; Mixed = benefit in some populations/endpoints but not others, or positive self-report with null objective measures; the corresponding grade reflects this nuance. Cells marked "needs verification" could not be independently confirmed at publication and are flagged for the next review cycle rather than estimated.

---

Draft Show HN post

Title: Show HN: Human-Trial Evidence Index — 25 supplements ranked by actual human-trial strength (open CSV, every cell cited)

Body:

I help run purecityresearch.org, an editorially independent, reader-funded supplement-evidence site (no ads, no manufacturer sponsorship). The biggest gap we saw: when people ask "which supplements actually have evidence?", the answer usually comes from a single ad-supported database. So we built an openly licensed, machine-readable index that ranks 25 widely used supplement ingredients purely by the strength of their human clinical-trial evidence — not popularity or mechanistic plausibility.

Each row records: primary claimed use, number of human RCTs, pooled participants from a named meta-analysis, direction of effect (positive/mixed), an evidence grade (Strong/Moderate/Weak/Insufficient), a one-line justification, a verifiable source citation (PubMed/Cochrane/NIH ODS), the typical effective dose from trials, and a headline safety note.

Every value traces to a public source. Where we couldn't independently verify a number, we wrote "needs verification" instead of guessing. Industry-funded evidence is treated as a downgrade signal — for example, collagen's positive skin effects disappear once industry-funded trials are excluded. The full table plus a CSV mirror (intended for a Zenodo DOI + GitHub mirror) is in the repo.

This is v1 (25 of a planned 50 ingredients). We grade conservatively: creatine and psyllium reach Strong; melatonin, magnesium, berberine, St John's wort land Moderate; rhodiola, tongkat ali, shilajit, glutathione are Weak/Insufficient. We'd love feedback on the grading rubric and any rows where the evidence picture is wrong.

---

Dataset mirror

- CSV: `evidence-index-v1.csv` (same 25 rows, machine-readable, CC BY 4.0)
- Intended for Zenodo DOI assignment + GitHub mirror at `github.com/pure-city/evidence-index`
- JSON-LD `Dataset` + `MedicalWebPage` schema to be added at publication (per Proposal 1, §2)

---

*Pure City Research is editorially independent and reader-supported. This index is educational, not medical advice; consult a clinician before starting, stopping, or changing any supplement, especially if you take prescription medications. Several ingredients listed (St John's wort, berberine, nattokinase, garlic, omega-3) carry clinically significant drug-interaction or bleeding risks.*

Have a question — or want us to cover something?

Ask about anything on this page, or request the next deep dive: an ingredient, a supplement, or a health concern. We use published research, evidence syntheses, and regulatory guidance, with clear source links.

We store your topic, message, optional email, and this page so we can manage and reply to the request. Do not include diagnoses, medications, or other sensitive medical information. See our Privacy Policy.